AOCIF
Price
$12.19
Change
+$0.32 (+2.70%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
462.54M
BWTL
Price
$4.00
Change
+$0.15 (+3.90%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
5.46M
Ad is loading...

AOCIF vs BWTL

Header iconAOCIF vs BWTL Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs BWTLBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$12.19
Change+$0.32 (+2.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization462.54M
Bowlin Travel Centers
Price$4.00
Change+$0.15 (+3.90%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization5.46M
AOCIF vs BWTL Comparison Chart
Loading...
AOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. BWTL commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and BWTL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $12.19 vs. BWTL: $4.00)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and BWTL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 55% vs. BWTL: 129%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $462.54M vs. BWTL: $5.46M
AOCIF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $462.54M. BWTL’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $5.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBWTL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BWTL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOCIF and BWTL are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOCIF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWTL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOCIF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BWTL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWTL is a better buy in the short-term than AOCIF.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.70% price change this week, while BWTL (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+1.91% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOCIF($463M) has a higher market cap than BWTL($5.46M). AOCIF YTD gains are higher at: 2.696 vs. BWTL (0.000). AOCIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 217M vs. BWTL (1.03M). AOCIF has more cash in the bank: 103M vs. BWTL (4.58M). BWTL has less debt than AOCIF: BWTL (6.91M) vs AOCIF (2.24B). AOCIF has higher revenues than BWTL: AOCIF (6.44B) vs BWTL (27.5M).
AOCIFBWTLAOCIF / BWTL
Capitalization463M5.46M8,483%
EBITDA217M1.03M21,068%
Gain YTD2.6960.000-
P/E Ratio11.74N/A-
Revenue6.44B27.5M23,407%
Total Cash103M4.58M2,249%
Total Debt2.24B6.91M32,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF vs BWTL: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
BWTL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8963
SMR RATING
1..100
927
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6373
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AOCIF's Valuation (54) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (54). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

BWTL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as AOCIF (89). This means that BWTL’s stock grew similarly to AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

BWTL's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AOCIF (92). This means that BWTL’s stock grew significantly faster than AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as BWTL (73). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWTL (96). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than BWTL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOCIFBWTL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
59%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AOCIF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BWTL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RYNCX106.521.54
+1.47%
Rydex Nova C
RYLDX175.092.54
+1.47%
Rydex Dow 2x Strategy A
MSFBX33.030.13
+0.40%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Franchise A
CBFEX37.090.14
+0.38%
American Funds Global Balanced 529E
HGHAX35.19-0.25
-0.71%
Hartford Healthcare A

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOCIF and BWTL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOCIF and BWTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
N/A
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.11%
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - AOCIF
17%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
CYYHF - AOCIF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More