Ad is loading...
AOCIF
Price
$12.79
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CDNAF
Price
$107.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

AOCIF vs CDNAF

Header iconAOCIF vs CDNAF Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs CDNAFBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$12.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Canadian Tire
Price$107.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8.89K
CapitalizationN/A
AOCIF vs CDNAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. CDNAF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and CDNAF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $12.79 vs. CDNAF: $107.78)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and CDNAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 16% vs. CDNAF: 1954%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $462.54M vs. CDNAF: $8B
AOCIF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $462.54M. CDNAF’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDNAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDNAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AOCIF is a better buy in the long-term than CDNAF.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +7.84% price change this week, while CDNAF (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.18% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDNAF($8B) has a higher market cap than AOCIF($463M). CDNAF (12.22) and AOCIF (11.74) have similar P/E ratio . CDNAF YTD gains are higher at: 1.488 vs. AOCIF (-18.275). CDNAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. AOCIF (217M). CDNAF has more cash in the bank: 489M vs. AOCIF (103M). AOCIF has less debt than CDNAF: AOCIF (2.24B) vs CDNAF (8.38B). CDNAF has higher revenues than AOCIF: CDNAF (17.7B) vs AOCIF (6.44B).
AOCIFCDNAFAOCIF / CDNAF
Capitalization463M8B6%
EBITDA217M2.22B10%
Gain YTD-18.2751.488-1,228%
P/E Ratio11.7412.2296%
Revenue6.44B17.7B36%
Total Cash103M489M21%
Total Debt2.24B8.38B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF vs CDNAF: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
CDNAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
8
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
78100
SMR RATING
1..100
8976
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5258
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDNAF's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AOCIF (55). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Profit vs Risk Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (100). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

CDNAF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as AOCIF (89). This means that CDNAF’s stock grew similarly to AOCIF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as CDNAF (58). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew similarly to CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

AOCIF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDNAF (98). This means that AOCIF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDNAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLOZF0.260.02
+8.08%
Cannabix Technologies Inc.
EJPRY9.330.07
+0.76%
East Japan Railway Co.
SKFRY18.70-0.04
-0.21%
AB SKF
ATLKY15.89-0.22
-1.39%
Atlas Copco AB
SYAAF0.16-0.01
-5.42%
Syrah Resources Ltd.

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOCIF and BWTL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOCIF and BWTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
N/A
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.19%
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - AOCIF
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
VRM - AOCIF
14%
Poorly correlated
-24.09%
More

CDNAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CDNAF has been loosely correlated with PAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CDNAF jumps, then PAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDNAF
1D Price
Change %
CDNAF100%
+0.12%
PAG - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
SAH - CDNAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
AN - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
KMX - CDNAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.23%
LAD - CDNAF
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
More