AOCIF
Price
$11.25
Change
-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
462.54M
VRM
Price
$26.90
Change
-$1.14 (-4.07%)
Updated
Apr 7, 01:06 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
24.1M
Ad is loading...

AOCIF vs VRM

Header iconAOCIF vs VRM Comparison
Open Charts AOCIF vs VRMBanner chart's image
Autocanada
Price$11.25
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
Volume$3.9K
Capitalization462.54M
Vroom
Price$26.90
Change-$1.14 (-4.07%)
Volume$300
Capitalization24.1M
AOCIF vs VRM Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOCIF vs. VRM commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOCIF is a Hold and VRM is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AOCIF: $11.25 vs. VRM: $28.04)
Brand notoriety: AOCIF and VRM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOCIF: 557% vs. VRM: 44%
Market capitalization -- AOCIF: $462.54M vs. VRM: $24.1M
AOCIF [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $462.54M. VRM’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $24.1M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $9.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOCIF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOCIF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AOCIF and VRM are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

AOCIF (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.88% price change this week, while VRM (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -4.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

VRM is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-4.38% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOCIF($463M) has a higher market cap than VRM($24.1M). VRM has higher P/E ratio than AOCIF: VRM (13.28) vs AOCIF (11.74). VRM YTD gains are higher at: 459.681 vs. AOCIF (-5.223). AOCIF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 217M vs. VRM (-276M). VRM has more cash in the bank: 140M vs. AOCIF (103M). VRM has less debt than AOCIF: VRM (1.23B) vs AOCIF (2.24B). AOCIF has higher revenues than VRM: AOCIF (6.44B) vs VRM (893M).
AOCIFVRMAOCIF / VRM
Capitalization463M24.1M1,921%
EBITDA217M-276M-79%
Gain YTD-5.223459.681-1%
P/E Ratio11.7413.2888%
Revenue6.44B893M721%
Total Cash103M140M74%
Total Debt2.24B1.23B181%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOCIF: Fundamental Ratings
AOCIF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
96
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
73
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMCF1.19N/A
-0.01%
Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory
REX36.14-0.15
-0.41%
REX American Resources Corp
FSP1.70-0.05
-2.86%
Franklin Street Properties Corp
EXR138.21-5.95
-4.13%
Extra Space Storage
SEDG14.71-0.72
-4.64%
SolarEdge Technologies

AOCIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOCIF and BWTL have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOCIF and BWTL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOCIF
1D Price
Change %
AOCIF100%
N/A
BWTL - AOCIF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LEFUF - AOCIF
29%
Poorly correlated
-8.74%
HPCRF - AOCIF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDNAF - AOCIF
17%
Poorly correlated
-3.60%
VRM - AOCIF
14%
Poorly correlated
-8.01%
More

VRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VRM has been loosely correlated with HNST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if VRM jumps, then HNST could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VRM
1D Price
Change %
VRM100%
-8.01%
HNST - VRM
41%
Loosely correlated
-3.13%
CPRT - VRM
40%
Loosely correlated
-3.76%
CVNA - VRM
33%
Poorly correlated
-10.57%
LE - VRM
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
LOW - VRM
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
More