Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFAX vs WCMNX
AOFAX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts AOFAX vs WCMNX
Alger Small Cap Focus A
Price$18.20
Change-$0.05 (-0.27%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets863.34M
WCM Small Cap Growth Investor
Price$12.67
Change-$0.07 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets43.34M
AOFAX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFAX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jul 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFAX is a Hold and WCMNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOFAX has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. WCMNX (43.3M). AOFAX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . AOFAX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: AOFAX (17 years) vs WCMNX (6 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than AOFAX (1.22). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. AOFAX (60.23). AOFAX (1000) and WCMNX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AOFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.00 vs. WCMNX (-1.02). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : 19.30 vs. AOFAX (-29.48).
| AOFAX | WCMNX | AOFAX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.24 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 2.04 | 60% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.001 | -0.158 | 4,442% |
| Front Load | 5% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 43.3M | 1,993% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.00 | -1.02 | -394% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.98 | 20.67 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.48 | 19.30 | -153% |
| Returns for 10 years | 53.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement