Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOFYX vs NRGSX
AOFYX vs NRGSX Comparison
Open Charts AOFYX vs NRGSX
Alger Small Cap Focus Y
Price$21.51
Change+$0.49 (+2.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets825.82M
Neuberger Berman Genesis R6
Price$60.43
Change+$0.04 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.19B
AOFYX vs NRGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOFYX vs. NRGSX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOFYX is a Hold and NRGSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NRGSX has more cash in the bank: 8.19B vs. AOFYX (826M). NRGSX pays higher dividends than AOFYX: NRGSX (0.07) vs AOFYX (0.00). AOFYX was incepted earlier than NRGSX: AOFYX (9 years) vs NRGSX (13 years). AOFYX (0.89) is less costly to investors than NRGSX (0.74). AOFYX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.23 vs. NRGSX (13.00). NRGSX has a lower initial minimum investment than AOFYX: NRGSX (0) vs AOFYX (500000). AOFYX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.99 vs. NRGSX (-14.62). NRGSX return over 5 years is better than : -11.01 vs. AOFYX (-29.37).
| AOFYX | NRGSX | AOFYX / NRGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.86 | 0.74 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.74 | 120% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.526 | -7.590 | -7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 826M | 8.19B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.99 | -14.62 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.65 | -4.10 | -577% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.37 | -11.01 | 267% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 3.70 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement