AOMFF
Price
$23.08
Change
+$0.09 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
10.75B
CDGLY
Price
$23.35
Change
-$0.16 (-0.68%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOMFF vs CDGLY

Header iconAOMFF vs CDGLY Comparison
Open Charts AOMFF vs CDGLYBanner chart's image
Alstom
Price$23.08
Change+$0.09 (+0.39%)
Volume$304
Capitalization10.75B
Comfortdelgro
Price$23.35
Change-$0.16 (-0.68%)
Volume$490
Capitalization2.47B
AOMFF vs CDGLY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AOMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOMFF vs. CDGLY commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOMFF is a Hold and CDGLY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AOMFF: $23.08 vs. CDGLY: $23.35)
Brand notoriety: AOMFF and CDGLY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOMFF: 159% vs. CDGLY: 136%
Market capitalization -- AOMFF: $10.75B vs. CDGLY: $2.47B
AOMFF [@Railroads] is valued at $10.75B. CDGLY’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $2.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $130.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $16.54B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCDGLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AOMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CDGLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CDGLY is a better buy in the long-term than AOMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AOMFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDGLY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AOMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CDGLY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDGLY is a better buy in the short-term than AOMFF.

Price Growth

AOMFF (@Railroads) experienced а -3.42% price change this week, while CDGLY (@Railroads) price change was -0.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -0.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (-0.65% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOMFF($10.7B) has a higher market cap than CDGLY($2.47B). AOMFF has higher P/E ratio than CDGLY: AOMFF (63.85) vs CDGLY (14.74). CDGLY YTD gains are higher at: 6.324 vs. AOMFF (-0.517). AOMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.26B vs. CDGLY (772M). AOMFF has higher revenues than CDGLY: AOMFF (18.5B) vs CDGLY (4.78B).
AOMFFCDGLYAOMFF / CDGLY
Capitalization10.7B2.47B433%
EBITDA1.26B772M163%
Gain YTD-0.5176.324-8%
P/E Ratio63.8514.74433%
Revenue18.5B4.78B387%
Total Cash2.27BN/A-
Total Debt3.59BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOMFF vs CDGLY: Fundamental Ratings
AOMFF
CDGLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8791
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
9588
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5349
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4463
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDGLY's Valuation (63) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (88). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (100). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGLY's SMR Rating (88) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (95). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CDGLY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (53). This means that CDGLY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as CDGLY (63). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CDGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AOMFFCDGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AOMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MQGIX54.83N/A
N/A
MFS International Growth I
SGTTX89.21N/A
N/A
Columbia Seligman Global Tech Inst2
MGWRX60.89N/A
N/A
MFS Global Growth R2
PFPFX55.90N/A
N/A
Poplar Forest Partners A
CENTX14.02N/A
N/A
Centerstone Investors I

AOMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOMFF and ALSMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOMFF and ALSMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOMFF
1D Price
Change %
AOMFF100%
N/A
ALSMY - AOMFF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
CRYCY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGLY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRF - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - AOMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
More

CDGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDGLY and AOMFF have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDGLY and AOMFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDGLY
1D Price
Change %
CDGLY100%
N/A
AOMFF - CDGLY
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EJPRF - CDGLY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRYCY - CDGLY
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - CDGLY
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.18%
ALSMY - CDGLY
-7%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
More