AOMFF
Price
$21.61
Change
-$0.36 (-1.64%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
10.05B
CRYCY
Price
$3.53
Change
-$0.08 (-2.22%)
Updated
Apr 2 closing price
Capitalization
6.89B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AOMFF vs CRYCY

Header iconAOMFF vs CRYCY Comparison
Open Charts AOMFF vs CRYCYBanner chart's image
Alstom
Price$21.61
Change-$0.36 (-1.64%)
Volume$8.15K
Capitalization10.05B
China Railroad Signal & Communication
Price$3.53
Change-$0.08 (-2.22%)
Volume$445
Capitalization6.89B
AOMFF vs CRYCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AOMFF vs. CRYCY commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOMFF is a Hold and CRYCY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (AOMFF: $21.61 vs. CRYCY: $3.53)
Brand notoriety: AOMFF and CRYCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Railroads industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AOMFF: 504% vs. CRYCY: 100%
Market capitalization -- AOMFF: $10.05B vs. CRYCY: $6.89B
AOMFF [@Railroads] is valued at $10.05B. CRYCY’s [@Railroads] market capitalization is $6.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Railroads] industry ranges from $133.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Railroads] industry is $15.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AOMFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCRYCY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AOMFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CRYCY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRYCY is a better buy in the long-term than AOMFF.

Price Growth

AOMFF (@Railroads) experienced а -3.29% price change this week, while CRYCY (@Railroads) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Railroads industry was -1.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.32%.

Reported Earning Dates

AOMFF is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Railroads (-1.00% weekly)

The Railroad industry includes passenger and freight transportation services along rail lines. This also includes companies that provide maintenance and switching duties as part of rail services. Within North America, the industry is largely dominated by some large operators. Several short-line railroads serve regional and local routes. Union Pacific Corporation, Canadian National Railway Company, and CSX Corporation are some of the prominent names in the business. The railroad business is relatively cyclical; economic expansion boost the freight services in particular, while economic stagnation often dampens transportation demand.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOMFF($10.1B) has a higher market cap than CRYCY($6.89B). AOMFF has higher P/E ratio than CRYCY: AOMFF (61.02) vs CRYCY (7.95). AOMFF YTD gains are higher at: -6.871 vs. CRYCY (-24.733). CRYCY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.81B vs. AOMFF (902M). CRYCY has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. AOMFF (1.79B). AOMFF has less debt than CRYCY: AOMFF (3.56B) vs CRYCY (5.31B). CRYCY has higher revenues than AOMFF: CRYCY (34.6B) vs AOMFF (18B).
AOMFFCRYCYAOMFF / CRYCY
Capitalization10.1B6.89B147%
EBITDA902M4.81B19%
Gain YTD-6.871-24.73328%
P/E Ratio61.027.95768%
Revenue18B34.6B52%
Total Cash1.79B23.8B8%
Total Debt3.56B5.31B67%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AOMFF vs CRYCY: Fundamental Ratings
AOMFF
CRYCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5844
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10079
SMR RATING
1..100
9810
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6176
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5475
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRYCY's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AOMFF (70). This means that CRYCY’s stock grew somewhat faster than AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRYCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as AOMFF (100). This means that CRYCY’s stock grew similarly to AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

CRYCY's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AOMFF (98). This means that CRYCY’s stock grew significantly faster than AOMFF’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as CRYCY (76). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CRYCY’s over the last 12 months.

AOMFF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as CRYCY (75). This means that AOMFF’s stock grew similarly to CRYCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUXIX31.710.26
+0.83%
Auxier Focus Institutional
GSSUX38.61N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value R6
SEGIX38.64N/A
N/A
NAA Large Cap Value C
GKIRX26.19N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Income Builder Inv
TRZLX42.27N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price US Large-Cap Core Z

AOMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AOMFF and ALSMY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOMFF and ALSMY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AOMFF
1D Price
Change %
AOMFF100%
-1.67%
ALSMY - AOMFF
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
CRYCY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CDGLY - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
-9.08%
EJPRF - AOMFF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - AOMFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
More

CRYCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRYCY and CJPRF have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRYCY and CJPRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRYCY
1D Price
Change %
CRYCY100%
N/A
CJPRF - CRYCY
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AOMFF - CRYCY
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
EJPRF - CRYCY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CJPRY - CRYCY
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.09%
ALSMY - CRYCY
3%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More