Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$63.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$223.73K
Net Assets2.72B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.48
Change-$0.05 (-0.14%)
Volume$663.89K
Net Assets3.31B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Buy and CGBL is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.31B vs. AOR (2.72B). AOR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: AOR (12.043) vs CGBL (11.253). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 12.043 | 11.253 | 107% |
| Net Assets | 2.72B | 3.31B | 82% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.54 | 1.89 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 67% | 9 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PDP | 113.93 | 0.15 | +0.13% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | |||
| UNOV | 37.16 | 0.04 | +0.11% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF Nov | |||
| FISR | 26.06 | -0.05 | -0.19% |
| SPDR® SSGA Fixed Inc Sect Rotation ETF | |||
| OOSB | 16.91 | -0.05 | -0.28% |
| One+One S&P 500 and Bitcoin ETF | |||
| IPOS | 16.75 | -0.14 | -0.84% |
| Renaissance International IPO ETF | |||
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -0.08% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
More | ||||