Ad is loading...
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$55.32
Change-$0.97 (-1.72%)
Volume$1.47K
Net Assets2.27B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$30.27
Change-$0.91 (-2.92%)
Volume$830.99K
Net Assets1.88B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AOR has more net assets: 2.27B vs. CGBL (1.88B). AOR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: AOR (-1.374) vs CGBL (-2.811). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (16 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). AOR has a higher turnover CGBL (3.00) vs CGBL (3.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | -1.374 | -2.811 | 49% |
| Net Assets | 2.27B | 1.88B | 121% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 3.00 | 167% |
| Yield | 2.65 | 2.00 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 60% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 57% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 67% | 8 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 38% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -2.92% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 72% Closely correlated | -9.86% | ||
| AVGO - CGBL | 71% Closely correlated | -10.51% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 68% Closely correlated | -12.77% | ||
| AMAT - CGBL | 67% Closely correlated | -8.28% | ||
| TSM - CGBL | 65% Loosely correlated | -7.64% | ||
More | ||||