Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOR vs CGBL
AOR vs CGBL Comparison
Open Charts AOR vs CGBL
iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allc ETF
Price$64.02
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$5.65K
Net Assets2.93B
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
Price$34.31
Change+$0.06 (+0.18%)
Volume$1.53K
Net Assets3.86B
AOR vs CGBL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOR vs. CGBL commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOR is a Hold and CGBL is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGBL has more net assets: 3.86B vs. AOR (2.93B). AOR has a higher annual dividend yield than CGBL: AOR (13.450) vs CGBL (11.102). AOR was incepted earlier than CGBL: AOR (17 years) vs CGBL (2 years). AOR (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than CGBL (0.33). CGBL has a higher turnover AOR (5.00) vs AOR (5.00).
| AOR | CGBL | AOR / CGBL | |
| Gain YTD | 13.450 | 11.102 | 121% |
| Net Assets | 2.93B | 3.86B | 76% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.33 | 45% |
| Turnover | 5.00 | 24.00 | 21% |
| Yield | 2.45 | 1.95 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AOR | CGBL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 7 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPF | 73.52 | 0.13 | +0.17% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF | |||
| FFOX | 26.85 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
| Fundx Future Fund Opportunities ETF | |||
| DEED | 21.59 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| First Trust Securitized Plus ETF | |||
| IGEB | 45.65 | 0.03 | +0.07% |
| iShares Investment Grade Systmtc Bd ETF | |||
| MCHS | 32.63 | -0.48 | -1.46% |
| Matthews China Discovery Active ETF | |||
AOR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AOR and FIG have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AOR and FIG's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
CGBL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGBL has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGBL jumps, then BX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGBL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | 100% | -0.32% | ||
| BX - CGBL | 79% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| KKR - CGBL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.14% | ||
| APO - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| ARES - CGBL | 77% Closely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| OWL - CGBL | 76% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
More | ||||