Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AOTCX vs RNWHX
AOTCX vs RNWHX Comparison
Open Charts AOTCX vs RNWHX
Virtus Emerging Markets Opps C
Price$35.30
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets190.43M
American Funds New World R5E
Price$94.55
Change-$0.09 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets74.73B
AOTCX vs RNWHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AOTCX vs. RNWHX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AOTCX is a Hold and RNWHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNWHX has more cash in the bank: 74.7B vs. AOTCX (190M). AOTCX pays higher dividends than RNWHX: AOTCX (3.22) vs RNWHX (0.93). AOTCX was incepted earlier than RNWHX: AOTCX (19 years) vs RNWHX (10 years). AOTCX (2.27) is less costly to investors than RNWHX (0.72). AOTCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 146.00 vs. RNWHX (37.00). RNWHX has a lower initial minimum investment than AOTCX: RNWHX (250) vs AOTCX (2500). AOTCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.67 vs. RNWHX (15.49). RNWHX (29.20) and AOTCX (28.33) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AOTCX | RNWHX | AOTCX / RNWHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.04 | 0.72 | 283% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.27 | 0.72 | 315% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 22.188 | 24.494 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 190M | 74.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.22 | 0.93 | 347% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.67 | 15.49 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.52 | 57.44 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.33 | 29.20 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 71.47 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement