Advertisement
APAJF vs CGHLY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAJF is a Hold and CGHLY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APAJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGHLY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- APAJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CGHLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APAJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGHLY’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APAJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CGHLY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APAJF (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -0.92% price change this week, while CGHLY (@Gas Distributors) price change was -0.28% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.19%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Gas Distributors (+0.79% weekly)Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.
| APAJF | CGHLY | APAJF / CGHLY | |
| Capitalization | 7.78B | 5.54B | 141% |
| EBITDA | 1.94B | 10B | 19% |
| Gain YTD | 47.625 | 21.341 | 223% |
| P/E Ratio | 118.78 | 12.73 | 933% |
| Revenue | 3.18B | 79.3B | 4% |
| Total Cash | 800M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14B | N/A | - |
APAJF | CGHLY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 94 | 36 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 1 | 32 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CGHLY's Valuation (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APAJF (67). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew somewhat faster than APAJF’s over the last 12 months.
CGHLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APAJF (100). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to APAJF’s over the last 12 months.
CGHLY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APAJF (100). This means that CGHLY’s stock grew similarly to APAJF’s over the last 12 months.
APAJF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHLY (52). This means that APAJF’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
APAJF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as CGHLY (32). This means that APAJF’s stock grew similarly to CGHLY’s over the last 12 months.
| APAJF | CGHLY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 42% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 47% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XFIV | 49.96 | 0.18 | +0.37% |
| BondBloxx Bloomberg FiveYrTrgDurUSTrsETF | |||
| CARU | 29.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Max Auto Industry 3X Leveraged ETN | |||
| NFJ | 12.85 | -0.10 | -0.77% |
| Virtus Dividend Interest & Premium Strategy Fund | |||
| GEND | 11.13 | -0.15 | -1.32% |
| Genter Capital Dividend Income ETF | |||
| PXE | 27.40 | -0.63 | -2.26% |
| Invesco Energy Exploration & Prod ETF | |||
APAJF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that APAJF and CGHOF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APAJF and CGHOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APAJF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APAJF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CGHOF - APAJF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CGHLY - APAJF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.28% | ||
| OPAL - APAJF | 6% Poorly correlated | -7.91% | ||
| SWX - APAJF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.05% | ||
| OGS - APAJF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||
CGHLY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGHLY and XNGSY have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGHLY and XNGSY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGHLY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGHLY | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| XNGSY - CGHLY | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.59% | ||
| XNGSF - CGHLY | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| APAJF - CGHLY | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BIPC - CGHLY | 7% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
| NI - CGHLY | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.76% | ||
More | ||||