APAM
Price
$41.57
Change
+$0.42 (+1.02%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
2.95B
59 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FHI
Price
$62.40
Change
+$0.24 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
4.66B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

APAM vs FHI

APAM vs FHI Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APAM vs. FHI commentary
Sep 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APAM is a Hold and FHI is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 05, 2026
Stock price -- (APAM: $41.57 vs. FHI: $62.40)
Brand notoriety: APAM and FHI are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APAM: 64% vs. FHI: 70%
Market capitalization -- APAM: $2.95B vs. FHI: $4.66B
APAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.95B. FHI’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $4.66B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $173.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHI’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • APAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FHI’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than APAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FHI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the short-term than APAM.

Price Growth

APAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.37% price change this week, while FHI (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

APAM is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

FHI is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.69% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHI($4.66B) has a higher market cap than APAM($2.95B). FHI has higher P/E ratio than APAM: FHI (11.60) vs APAM (9.97). FHI YTD gains are higher at: 22.206 vs. APAM (10.178). FHI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 592M vs. APAM (502M). APAM has less debt than FHI: APAM (309M) vs FHI (452M). FHI has higher revenues than APAM: FHI (1.93B) vs APAM (1.25B).
APAMFHIAPAM / FHI
Capitalization2.95B4.66B63%
EBITDA502M592M85%
Gain YTD10.17822.20646%
P/E Ratio9.9711.6086%
Revenue1.25B1.93B65%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt309M452M68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APAM vs FHI: Fundamental Ratings
APAM
FHI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6472
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
679
SMR RATING
1..100
1730
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6946
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APAM's Valuation (4) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (16) in the null industry. This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APAM (67) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than APAM’s over the last 12 months.

APAM's SMR Rating (17) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (30) in the null industry. This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

APAM's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (49) in the null industry. This means that APAM’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as APAM (69) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to APAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APAMFHI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OKLL2.510.16
+6.81%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long OKLO ETF
DVQQ31.720.14
+0.43%
WEBs QQQ Defined Volatility ETF
BREM50.710.14
+0.27%
iShares Emerging Markets Bond Active ETF
VRP24.170.04
+0.17%
Invesco Variable Rate Preferred ETF
IBMR25.17N/A
-0.02%
iShares iBonds Dec 2029 Term Muni Bd ETF