APD vs LIN
Both APD and LIN have recently benefited from renewed consumer interest in hydrogen as a fuel and energy storage medium, but both are involved with the production, storage, and transport of multiple kinds of gasses. While both companies are large, APD is approximately half the size of its counterpart. APD’s margins have outdone LIN’s, and they also appear to be more solid in terms of their current ratio, and yet LIN has enjoyed consistent stock price growth over the past years while APD is about where it was a year ago in terms of stock price at the time of this writing. The previous sentence also might be misleading, because just prior to one year ago, the company experienced a significant price jump in a short span of time, and the following months seem to confirm that a floor is present. Evaluating these companies on their other merits, outside of participation in the hydrogen market, is beneficial of course.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- APD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APD’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APD’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- LIN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APD (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -5.43% price change this week, while LIN (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.65% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
APD is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.
LIN is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.79% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
| APD | LIN | APD / LIN | |
| Capitalization | 54.1B | 223B | 24% |
| EBITDA | 4.5B | 12.2B | 37% |
| Gain YTD | 2.213 | 7.763 | 29% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.27 | 36.81 | 63% |
| Revenue | 12.4B | 32.9B | 38% |
| Total Cash | 2.23B | 4.66B | 48% |
| Total Debt | 12.7B | 20.3B | 63% |
APD | LIN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIN's Valuation (84) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as APD (93). This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to APD’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APD (43). This means that LIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than APD’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's SMR Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as APD (100). This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to APD’s over the last 12 months.
APD's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as LIN (52). This means that APD’s stock grew similarly to LIN’s over the last 12 months.
LIN's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as APD (79). This means that LIN’s stock grew similarly to APD’s over the last 12 months.
| APD | LIN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 46% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 32% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | 2 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 43% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 23 days ago 61% | 17 days ago 56% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 54% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 42% |
