APELF vs APELY
To understand the difference between Alps Alpine Co Ltd (APELF) vs. Alps Alpine Co Ltd - ADR (APELY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR
ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APELF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileAPELY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- APELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- APELY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APELF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while APELY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APELF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
- APELY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
APELF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while APELY (@Electronic Components) price change was +4.04% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.35%.
Reported Earning Dates
APELY is expected to report earnings on Feb 04, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Components (+0.59% weekly)The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.
| APELF | APELY | APELF / APELY | |
| Capitalization | 2.12B | 2.12B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 16.1B | 16.1B | 100% |
| Gain YTD | 25.891 | 25.625 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 979B | 979B | 100% |
| Total Cash | 85.1B | 85.1B | 100% |
| Total Debt | 98.9B | 98.9B | 100% |
APELF | APELY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 10 | 10 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 48 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 95 | 7 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APELF's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as APELY (13). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to APELY’s over the last 12 months.
APELF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APELY (100). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to APELY’s over the last 12 months.
APELF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as APELY (10). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to APELY’s over the last 12 months.
APELF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as APELY (48). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to APELY’s over the last 12 months.
APELY's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for APELF (95). This means that APELY’s stock grew significantly faster than APELF’s over the last 12 months.
| APELF | APELY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 54% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 29% | 2 days ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 73% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EIEMX | 14.47 | -0.20 | -1.36% |
| Parametric Emerging Markets I | |||
| FIQBX | 28.60 | -0.64 | -2.19% |
| Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Z | |||
| HADAX | 30.11 | -0.68 | -2.21% |
| Hartford Balanced HLS IA | |||
| HIGUX | 23.25 | -0.66 | -2.76% |
| Carillon Eagle Growth & Income R6 | |||
| FOVCX | 24.34 | -0.80 | -3.18% |
| First Trust/Confluence Small Cap Val C | |||
APELF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APELF has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APELF jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APELF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APELF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BHE - APELF | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.24% | ||
| TTDKF - APELF | 22% Poorly correlated | -11.02% | ||
| APELY - APELF | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HNHPF - APELF | 13% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| HPHTF - APELF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
APELY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that APELY and LYTS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APELY and LYTS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APELY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APELY | 100% | N/A | ||
| LYTS - APELY | 28% Poorly correlated | -5.12% | ||
| KN - APELY | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.58% | ||
| APELF - APELY | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HNHPF - APELY | 17% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
| HLRTF - APELY | 9% Poorly correlated | -8.00% | ||
More | ||||