APELF
Price
$10.00
Change
-$0.34 (-3.29%)
Updated
Apr 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.07B
TTDKF
Price
$11.50
Change
+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
21.47B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APELF vs TTDKF

Header iconAPELF vs TTDKF Comparison
Open Charts APELF vs TTDKFBanner chart's image
Alps Alpine
Price$10.00
Change-$0.34 (-3.29%)
Volume$400
Capitalization2.07B
TDK
Price$11.50
Change+$0.02 (+0.17%)
Volume$534
Capitalization21.47B
APELF vs TTDKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APELF vs. TTDKF commentary
Jul 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APELF is a Hold and TTDKF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 19, 2025
Stock price -- (APELF: $10.00 vs. TTDKF: $11.48)
Brand notoriety: APELF and TTDKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APELF: 100% vs. TTDKF: 39%
Market capitalization -- APELF: $2.07B vs. TTDKF: $21.47B
APELF [@Electronic Components] is valued at $2.07B. TTDKF’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $21.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $125B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.7B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APELF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APELF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTDKF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TTDKF is a better buy in the long-term than APELF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TTDKF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TTDKF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

APELF (@Electronic Components) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TTDKF (@Electronic Components) price change was +0.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.86% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TTDKF($21.5B) has a higher market cap than APELF($2.07B). TTDKF has higher P/E ratio than APELF: TTDKF (17.33) vs APELF (8.05). TTDKF YTD gains are higher at: -4.174 vs. APELF (-5.660). TTDKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. APELF (16.1B). TTDKF has more cash in the bank: 752B vs. APELF (85.1B). APELF has less debt than TTDKF: APELF (98.9B) vs TTDKF (687B). TTDKF has higher revenues than APELF: TTDKF (2.13T) vs APELF (979B).
APELFTTDKFAPELF / TTDKF
Capitalization2.07B21.5B10%
EBITDA16.1B446B4%
Gain YTD-5.660-4.174136%
P/E Ratio8.0517.3346%
Revenue979B2.13T46%
Total Cash85.1B752B11%
Total Debt98.9B687B14%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APELF vs TTDKF: Fundamental Ratings
APELF
TTDKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10080
SMR RATING
1..100
113
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10093
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
30n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APELF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as TTDKF (15). This means that APELF’s stock grew similarly to TTDKF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (100). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (11). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (55). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKF's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as APELF (100). This means that TTDKF’s stock grew similarly to APELF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APELFTTDKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TTDKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BILL47.411.51
+3.29%
BILL Holdings
MSB25.730.19
+0.74%
Mesabi Trust
SDHC19.870.08
+0.40%
Smith Douglas Homes Corp
MAMO2.73N/A
N/A
Massimo Group
IKNA1.26-0.03
-2.33%
Ikena Oncology

APELF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APELF has been loosely correlated with BHE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APELF jumps, then BHE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APELF
1D Price
Change %
APELF100%
N/A
BHE - APELF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.79%
TTDKF - APELF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
APELY - APELF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HNHPF - APELF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
HPHTF - APELF
0%
Poorly correlated
-2.04%
More

TTDKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TTDKF and MRAAY have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TTDKF and MRAAY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKF
1D Price
Change %
TTDKF100%
-0.69%
MRAAY - TTDKF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
CLS - TTDKF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOTGY - TTDKF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.42%
TYOYY - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
OLED - TTDKF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
More