APEMY
Price
$33.16
Change
+$0.92 (+2.85%)
Updated
Mar 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.4B
55 days until earnings call
CLF
Price
$8.74
Change
-$1.07 (-10.91%)
Updated
Mar 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.33B
38 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APEMY vs CLF

Header iconAPEMY vs CLF Comparison
Open Charts APEMY vs CLFBanner chart's image
Aperam
Price$33.16
Change+$0.92 (+2.85%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization2.4B
Cleveland-Cliffs
Price$8.74
Change-$1.07 (-10.91%)
Volume$136.05K
Capitalization4.33B
APEMY vs CLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APEMY vs. CLF commentary
Mar 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APEMY is a Hold and CLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 11, 2025
Stock price -- (APEMY: $33.16 vs. CLF: $9.81)
Brand notoriety: APEMY: Not notable vs. CLF: Notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APEMY: 307% vs. CLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- APEMY: $2.4B vs. CLF: $4.33B
APEMY [@Steel] is valued at $2.4B. CLF’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $4.33B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $30.83B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $5.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APEMY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APEMY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APEMY is a better buy in the long-term than CLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

APEMY (@Steel) experienced а +6.90% price change this week, while CLF (@Steel) price change was -9.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was -0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

APEMY is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2025.

CLF is expected to report earnings on Apr 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (-0.96% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLF($4.33B) has a higher market cap than APEMY($2.4B). CLF has higher P/E ratio than APEMY: CLF (145.67) vs APEMY (9.90). APEMY YTD gains are higher at: 30.402 vs. CLF (4.362). CLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 745M vs. APEMY (358M). CLF has higher revenues than APEMY: CLF (20B) vs APEMY (6.26B).
APEMYCLFAPEMY / CLF
Capitalization2.4B4.33B55%
EBITDA358M745M48%
Gain YTD30.4024.362697%
P/E Ratio9.90145.677%
Revenue6.26B20B31%
Total CashN/A39M-
Total DebtN/A3.77B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APEMY vs CLF: Fundamental Ratings
APEMY
CLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6686
SMR RATING
1..100
9187
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3881
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
872
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APEMY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLF (89) in the Steel industry. This means that APEMY’s stock grew significantly faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

APEMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (66) in the null industry is in the same range as CLF (86) in the Steel industry. This means that APEMY’s stock grew similarly to CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's SMR Rating (87) in the Steel industry is in the same range as APEMY (91) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew similarly to APEMY’s over the last 12 months.

APEMY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLF (81) in the Steel industry. This means that APEMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLF’s over the last 12 months.

CLF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Steel industry is significantly better than the same rating for APEMY (87) in the null industry. This means that CLF’s stock grew significantly faster than APEMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBZ9.860.18
+1.91%
First Trust Brazil AlphaDEX® ETF
CHW6.810.06
+0.89%
Calamos Global Dynamic Income Fund
AOA78.000.50
+0.65%
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allc ETF
VTN10.510.01
+0.10%
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals
JHPI22.62-0.01
-0.03%
JHancock Preferred Income ETF

APEMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APEMY and PKX have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APEMY and PKX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APEMY
1D Price
Change %
APEMY100%
N/A
PKX - APEMY
31%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
MT - APEMY
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.30%
CLF - APEMY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.49%
OUTKY - APEMY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSAAY - APEMY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
More

CLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLF has been closely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLF jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLF
1D Price
Change %
CLF100%
-2.49%
NUE - CLF
73%
Closely correlated
+1.31%
STLD - CLF
67%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
CMC - CLF
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.27%
RS - CLF
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.41%
MTUS - CLF
53%
Loosely correlated
+3.09%
More