It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileJ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while J’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -2.03% price change this week, while J (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -15.69% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +150.69%.
APG is expected to report earnings on Mar 03, 2026.
J is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| APG | J | APG / J | |
| Capitalization | 15.3B | 15.3B | 100% |
| EBITDA | 830M | 1.15B | 72% |
| Gain YTD | 53.336 | -1.631 | -3,270% |
| P/E Ratio | 102.14 | 50.07 | 204% |
| Revenue | 7.66B | 11.8B | 65% |
| Total Cash | 555M | 1.29B | 43% |
| Total Debt | 3.05B | 3B | 102% |
APG | J | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | 58 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 33 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 81 | 69 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 57 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
J's Valuation (85) in the null industry is in the same range as APG (92). This means that J’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as J (33). This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
J's SMR Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as APG (81). This means that J’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as J (57). This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to J’s over the last 12 months.
J's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as APG (11). This means that J’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | J | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 1 day ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 1 day ago 50% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 49% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 60% | 1 day ago 46% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 53% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EEV | 20.65 | 0.58 | +2.88% |
| ProShares UltraShort MSCI Emerging Mkts | |||
| BLCV | 35.22 | -0.33 | -0.92% |
| iShares Large Cap Value Active ETF | |||
| DGS | 55.57 | -0.58 | -1.03% |
| WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmCp Div ETF | |||
| PSP | 62.72 | -0.81 | -1.27% |
| Invesco Global Listed Private Equity ETF | |||
| IGME | 27.09 | -0.70 | -2.53% |
| Bitwise GME Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.