Advertisement
APG vs MTZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? APi Group Corporation (APG) vs. MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- MasTec (MTZ) has significantly outperformed APG year-to-date, with gains of approximately 78% compared to APG's 29%.
- Both stocks are near their 52-week highs, reflecting strong recent momentum amid infrastructure and safety services demand.
- APG has pursued growth through recent acquisitions in fire protection, enhancing its safety services segment.
- MTZ benefits from broad exposure to communications, clean energy, and power delivery, driving robust revenue growth.
- Market caps stand at $21.3 billion for APG and $30.4 billion for MTZ, with both appearing overvalued by traditional metrics like P/E ratios.
- Tickeron AI signals show bullish patterns for both, but MTZ exhibits stronger price growth ratings.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines APG and MTZ, two companies in the industrials sector focused on safety services and infrastructure construction, respectively. Traders seeking exposure to infrastructure spending and specialized services may find value in analyzing their relative performance. Both have shown resilience in recent market activity, with gains driven by sector tailwinds like data center builds and energy transitions. Investors comparing momentum, growth catalysts, and risk profiles can use this head-to-head to gauge positioning in a volatile environment favoring cyclical plays. (98 words)
APG Overview and Recent Performance
APG, or APi Group Corporation, specializes in fire and life safety, security, elevators, escalators, and specialty services across Safety Services and Specialty Services segments. Serving high-tech, healthcare, and critical infrastructure end markets, the company has a market capitalization of about $21.3 billion. In recent weeks, APG stock has surged over 20% in the past month, approaching its 52-week high of $49.63, amid elevated trading volumes. Key drivers include acquisitions like Onyx-Fire Protection Services and Wtech Fire Group, bolstering fire protection capabilities and organic growth. Positive AI signals, such as MACD turn positive and moving average crossovers, have supported sentiment, though overbought indicators like RSI suggest potential pullbacks. Year-to-date returns stand at 29%, outperforming some business services peers.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MTZ, or MasTec, Inc., is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm operating in communications, clean energy, power delivery, pipeline, and other segments primarily in North America. With a market cap of $30.4 billion, it supports wireless, renewable energy, and utility projects for providers and governments. Recent market activity has propelled MTZ shares up nearly 20% in the past month and 55% over three months, testing 52-week highs near $388. Analyst upgrades and infrastructure demand, including power delivery for AI-related builds, have fueled gains. Bullish patterns like Aroon uptrend and MACD histogram positivity dominate, despite overbought Stochastic readings. YTD performance of 78% has outpaced construction peers significantly.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots selected from over 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across various markets. These curated bots represent the most suitable for current conditions, featuring diverse styles such as signal agents, virtual agents, and brokerage agents with strategies spanning intraday to long-term timeframes. Many display strong stats, including annualized returns up to 40%, low-risk high-return profiles, and win rates often exceeding 60% in backtests. Whether focusing on momentum, mean reversion, or sector-specific plays like industrials, these bots offer verifiable performance metrics to suit different risk appetites. Traders can explore and copy these top performers to enhance strategies in today’s volatile market.
Head-to-Head Comparison
APG’s business model centers on recurring safety and specialty services with stable end markets like healthcare, contrasting MTZ’s project-based infrastructure construction exposed to communications and energy cycles. Growth drivers differ: APG via M&A in fire safety, MTZ through broad contracts in clean energy and power delivery amid U.S. infrastructure spending. Recent momentum favors MTZ with superior 3-month gains, while APG shows steady climbs. Risk factors include cyclicality for both, but MTZ’s higher beta amplifies volatility; APG benefits from service margins. Sector exposure overlaps in industrials yet diverges—APG in life safety, MTZ in utilities. Market sentiment leans positive for both per analyst buys, though MTZ’s larger scale and YTD edge provide relative stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTZ over APG based on stronger trend consistency, superior YTD momentum, and positioning in high-growth infrastructure subsectors like clean energy. Bullish patterns such as Aroon uptrends and recent analyst targets suggest higher probability of continued outperformance, though overbought conditions warrant caution for both. APG’s acquisition momentum remains compelling, but MTZ’s relative strength edges it ahead probabilistically in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a Buy and MTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +9.27% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +27.26%.
Reported Earning Dates
APG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-1.69% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| APG | MTZ | APG / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 18.5B | 32.1B | 58% |
| EBITDA | 902M | 1.22B | 74% |
| Gain YTD | 11.814 | 86.926 | 14% |
| P/E Ratio | 125.36 | 71.16 | 176% |
| Revenue | 8.17B | 15.3B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 645M | 274M | 235% |
| Total Debt | 3.07B | 3.02B | 102% |
APG | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 26 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 88 Overvalued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 13 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 48 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 11 | 36 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (86) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (88) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as MTZ (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APG (94) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than APG’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (48) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as MTZ (36) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 59% | 14 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 60% |
Advertisement
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | +7.02% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 80% Closely correlated | +5.40% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 75% Closely correlated | +5.04% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | +4.83% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +6.11% | ||
| ECG - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.44% | ||
More | ||||