Advertisement
APG vs MTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a Hold and MTZ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -3.34% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -5.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -6.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
APG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-6.34% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| APG | MTZ | APG / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 17.9B | 28.5B | 63% |
| EBITDA | 902M | 1.22B | 74% |
| Gain YTD | 8.207 | 65.713 | 12% |
| P/E Ratio | 125.36 | 63.08 | 199% |
| Revenue | 8.17B | 15.3B | 53% |
| Total Cash | 645M | 274M | 235% |
| Total Debt | 3.07B | 3.02B | 102% |
APG | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 74 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | 84 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 51 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (84) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (89) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as MTZ (17) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (60) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APG (95) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than APG’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as APG (55) in the null industry. This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to APG’s over the last 12 months.
APG's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (51) in the Engineering And Construction industry. This means that APG’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| APG | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 58% | 1 day ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 81% |
Advertisement
APG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with IESC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then IESC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APG | 100% | +0.10% | ||
| IESC - APG | 52% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
| FIX - APG | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| MTZ - APG | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| STRL - APG | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| ECG - APG | 46% Loosely correlated | -2.46% | ||
More | ||||
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -3.40% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | -1.80% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.37% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 75% Closely correlated | -1.78% | ||
| ECG - MTZ | 66% Closely correlated | -2.46% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.62% | ||
More | ||||