Advertisement
MTZ vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MasTec (MTZ) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both MTZ and PWR are direct beneficiaries of surging investment in electric grid modernization, power generation, and AI-driven data center infrastructure.
- PWR operates at a materially larger scale, with roughly double the quarterly revenue and a much larger backlog, while MTZ is delivering faster percentage revenue growth from a smaller base.
- Both companies reported record backlogs and raised full-year guidance in recent quarters, signaling strong near-term revenue visibility.
- MTZ carries heavier exposure to pipeline and communications work, whereas PWR is more concentrated in electric infrastructure and grid-related services.
- Valuations remain elevated across the sector, with both stocks trading at premium forward price-to-earnings (P/E) multiples relative to industry peers.
- For additional detail on each company, visit the MTZ Major News and MTZ Today's Price Move pages, as well as the PWR Major News and PWR Today's Price Move pages.
- To see how automated systems are trading these and other tickers, explore the Trending AI Robots section.
Introduction
Infrastructure engineering and construction companies have moved to the center of the market's attention as utilities, technology firms, and industrial customers accelerate spending on electricity transmission, grid reliability, and data center capacity. This stock comparison examines two leading players in that theme: MasTec, Inc. (MTZ), a diversified North American infrastructure contractor, and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR), the largest electrical infrastructure construction company in the United States. Investors focused on the energy transition, AI infrastructure buildout, and long-duration backlog growth may find this relative performance review useful for understanding how the two businesses differ in scale, strategy, and market positioning.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. is a North American infrastructure engineering and construction company operating across four segments: Communications, Clean Energy and Infrastructure, Power Delivery, and Pipeline Infrastructure. In recent quarters, the company has posted accelerating growth, driven by broad-based demand across renewables, power transmission, fiber connectivity, and natural gas pipelines. In its most recent quarter, revenue rose 23% year over year to a quarterly record of about $4.4 billion, while adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) increased roughly 49%. An 18-month backlog of approximately $21.4 billion, up 30% year over year, reflects strong booking momentum. MasTec also raised its full-year guidance and completed the acquisition of The Superior Group, an electrical contractor with meaningful data center exposure. These developments have supported a sharp rally in MTZ shares, though the stock now trades at a premium forward P/E multiple, and execution and project-timing risks remain key considerations.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. is the largest electrical infrastructure construction company in the United States, providing engineering, construction, and maintenance services for electric transmission, substations, power generation, and large-load facilities. It operates through two segments, Electric Infrastructure Solutions and Underground Utility and Infrastructure Solutions. Recent market activity has been driven by record demand across utility, transmission, and data center markets. In its latest quarter, revenue rose 41% year over year to about $9.6 billion, and adjusted EPS came in well ahead of consensus, reflecting accelerating growth. Total backlog reached a record of roughly $53.4 billion, up 49% year over year, and management again raised its full-year outlook. Quanta also completed several acquisitions and outlined a path to more than doubling adjusted EPS by 2030. The stock has outperformed the broader market over the past year, though it likewise trades at a premium valuation and remains sensitive to permitting, weather, and supply-chain variables.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron operates a curated Trending AI Robots page that highlights a selection of its AI trading bots. While Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI-driven trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, only those best suited to current market conditions earn a place in this featured section. These bots vary widely in trading style, strategy, timeframe, performance statistics, and the sets of tickers they cover, giving traders a broad menu of automated approaches. The page is designed to help users quickly identify the strategies currently generating the strongest signals and adapting to shifting market dynamics. For investors tracking infrastructure names such as MTZ and PWR, reviewing the Trending AI Robots section can offer a data-driven perspective on how automated systems are positioning for the current environment.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most striking difference between the two companies is scale. PWR generates roughly twice the quarterly revenue of MTZ and holds a backlog that is more than double MasTec's, giving it deeper visibility and a dominant position in electric grid infrastructure. In contrast, MTZ offers a more diversified mix that includes meaningful communications and pipeline exposure, which can add cyclical variability but also provides balance across end markets.
On growth, both companies have delivered accelerating top-line expansion, though MTZ has posted faster percentage revenue growth recently from a smaller base, while PWR has compounded larger absolute gains. Both raised guidance in recent quarters, reflecting strong demand. On valuation, each trades at a premium forward P/E, though PWR has generally commanded a higher multiple consistent with its scale and market leadership. Risk factors overlap significantly: labor availability, permitting delays, project timing, and potential tariff-related input costs affect both, but MTZ's exposure to large, complex projects introduces additional execution risk.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including trend consistency, backlog visibility, relative market positioning, and the consistency of recent earnings beats, Tickeron's AI would likely lean toward PWR as the more favorably positioned name in the current environment. The larger backlog, scale advantages, and repeated guidance increases suggest a steadier fundamental trajectory. That said, the verdict is probabilistic rather than definitive: MTZ's faster percentage growth and diversified segment mix could make it comparatively attractive during periods when momentum and upside surprise matter most. Traders should weigh these trade-offs against their own risk preferences and time horizon.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTZ is a Hold and PWR is a Buy.
MTZ's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MTZ turned positive on October 30, 2026. Looking at past instances where MTZ's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 41 of 50 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 82%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where MTZ's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 19 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 76%.
The Stochastic Oscillator suggests the stock price trend may be in a reversal from a downward trend to an upward trend. 40 of 51 cases where MTZ's Stochastic Oscillator exited the oversold zone resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 78%.
Following a +4.87% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MTZ advanced for three days, in 274 of 347 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 79%.
MTZ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 13, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on MTZ as a result. In 51 of 75 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MTZ declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 77%.
The Aroon Indicator for MTZ entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 55 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 56 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (4.297) is normal, around the industry mean (15.247). P/E Ratio (29.347) is within average values for comparable stocks, (166.505). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.616) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.198) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.103) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 74 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. MTZ’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 80 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. MTZ’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 84 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
PWR's RSI Oscillator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Indicator for PWR moved out of oversold territory on October 26, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 16 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 14 of the 16 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 88%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
Following a +9.74% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where PWR advanced for three days, in 258 of 348 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
PWR may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 254 of 362 cases where PWR Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 70%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator entered the overbought zone. Expect a price pull-back in the foreseeable future.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 15, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on PWR as a result. In 48 of 79 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 61%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for PWR turned negative on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 50 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In 33 of the 50 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at 66%.
PWR moved below its 50-day moving average on October 30, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for PWR crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 22, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where PWR declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 60%.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 17 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 39 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. PWR’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 56 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (9.683) is normal, around the industry mean (15.247). P/E Ratio (69.981) is within average values for comparable stocks, (166.505). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.443) is also within normal values, averaging (3.522). Dividend Yield (0.001) settles around the average of (0.198) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (2.860) is also within normal values, averaging (2.856).
MTZ | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 56 Fair valued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 55 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 80 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (85). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (74). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (55) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (56). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (80). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (84). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| MTZ | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 77% | 10 days ago 60% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 70% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while PWR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- MTZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +8.78% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +13.60% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +8.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+8.42% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.