Advertisement
MTZ vs PWR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? MasTec (MTZ) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both MTZ and PWR delivered strong Q1 2026 results, with revenue growth exceeding 30% year-over-year and record backlogs signaling robust demand in infrastructure sectors.
- MTZ shares have surged over 200% in the past year, outperforming PWR's 140% gain, driven by exceptional recent momentum and raised full-year guidance.
- PWR boasts a larger scale with $48.5 billion in backlog and higher absolute revenue, providing greater stability amid utility and renewable energy expansions.
- Recent analyst upgrades have lifted price targets for both, reflecting positive sentiment shifts from clean energy, communications, and power delivery growth drivers.
- In relative performance, MTZ shows higher volatility but superior short-term trend consistency, while PWR offers broader diversification across electric and underground infrastructure.
- Tickeron's AI models highlight infrastructure plays like PWR in trending bots with win rates above 56% and annualized returns over 70%.
Introduction
MasTec (MTZ) and Quanta Services (PWR) are leading infrastructure contractors benefiting from surging demand in communications, clean energy, and power delivery amid grid modernization and renewable transitions. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment of heightened capital spending by utilities and tech firms. Traders seeking momentum plays and investors eyeing long-term infrastructure growth will find value in evaluating their relative strengths, backlogs, and sentiment shifts for informed portfolio decisions.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) is an infrastructure engineering and construction firm specializing in communications, clean energy, power delivery, and pipeline projects across North America. In recent market activity, MTZ reported record Q1 2026 revenue of $3.8 billion, up 34% year-over-year, with adjusted EBITDA rising 73% due to strength across all segments. The company raised full-year guidance to $17.5 billion in revenue, supported by an 18-month backlog hitting $20.3 billion, up 65% in communications and clean energy. Shares have climbed over 100% year-to-date and 200% over the past year, reflecting bullish sentiment from analyst upgrades and infrastructure tailwinds, though higher beta (1.82) indicates elevated volatility.
PWR Overview and Recent Performance
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) provides comprehensive infrastructure solutions for electric power, pipeline, communications, and renewables, operating through Electric Infrastructure and Underground Utility segments. Recent quarters show Q1 2026 revenue reaching $7.9 billion, a 26% increase, with adjusted EBITDA at $686 million and EPS of $2.68 beating estimates by over 30%. Backlog expanded to a record $48.5 billion, including $26.2 billion in remaining performance obligations, prompting raised 2026 guidance amid demand from utilities, data centers, and manufacturing. The stock has advanced about 80% year-to-date and 140% over the past year, bolstered by steady execution and lower relative volatility (beta 1.24), though trading near highs signals premium valuation.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 AI trading bots from over 350 total agents, selected by advanced AI analysis for superior performance in current market conditions across high-growth sectors like industrials and technology. These bots showcase annualized returns ranging from 23% to 169%, with win rates of 51% to 88% and profit factors up to 3.24, employing strategies such as trend trading, multi-agent signals, and TP/SL corridors (e.g., 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss) on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes. Trading stocks, ETFs, and crypto including industrials like PWR, they adapt to momentum and sector rotation. Explore these bots to enhance your trading edge with real-time, data-driven signals tailored to volatile environments.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both MTZ and PWR thrive in overlapping infrastructure niches, but PWR's larger scale ($30B+ revenue vs. $15B) and diversified electric/underground exposure provide resilience, while MTZ emphasizes communications and clean energy for higher growth potential. Recent momentum favors MTZ with 200%+ one-year returns versus PWR's 140%, though PWR's massive $48.5B backlog dwarfs MTZ's $20.3B. Risk profiles differ: MTZ's beta of 1.82 signals greater sensitivity to market swings, contrasted by PWR's steadier 1.24. Sector catalysts like renewables and grid upgrades boost both, but PWR benefits more from utility scale, while MTZ leverages fiber/wireless demand. Market sentiment tilts toward MTZ for short-term upside amid post-earnings rallies, versus PWR's established positioning.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTZ over PWR, citing stronger trend consistency, explosive relative performance exceeding 200% annually, and backlog-driven catalysts in a bullish infrastructure cycle. While PWR excels in scale and stability, MTZ's recent earnings beats and momentum suggest higher near-term probability of outperformance, though with elevated volatility.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MTZ is a Hold and PWR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
MTZ’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PWR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
MTZ’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- MTZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- PWR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
Price Growth
MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -7.47% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -6.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.23% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| MTZ | PWR | MTZ / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 29.5B | 100B | 30% |
| EBITDA | 1.22B | 2.71B | 45% |
| Gain YTD | 71.795 | 58.441 | 123% |
| P/E Ratio | 71.16 | 98.77 | 72% |
| Revenue | 15.3B | 30.1B | 51% |
| Total Cash | 274M | 250M | 110% |
| Total Debt | 3.02B | 6.32B | 48% |
MTZ | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 12 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 17 | 5 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 60 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | 8 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTZ's Valuation (86) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (89). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (17). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (60) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as PWR (63). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (8) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (38). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (36). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| MTZ | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 63% |
Advertisement
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | -4.40% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 80% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 75% Closely correlated | -6.64% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| STRL - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ECG - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -8.45% | ||
More | ||||