APH
Price
$103.71
Change
+$0.37 (+0.36%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
125.45B
One day until earnings call
CLS
Price
$163.02
Change
+$2.90 (+1.81%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
18.68B
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH vs CLS

Header iconAPH vs CLS Comparison
Open Charts APH vs CLSBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$103.71
Change+$0.37 (+0.36%)
Volume$6.51M
Capitalization125.45B
Celestica
Price$163.02
Change+$2.90 (+1.81%)
Volume$3.59M
Capitalization18.68B
APH vs CLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. CLS commentary
Jul 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Hold and CLS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 22, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $103.71 vs. CLS: $163.02)
Brand notoriety: APH and CLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 81% vs. CLS: 108%
Market capitalization -- APH: $125.45B vs. CLS: $18.68B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $125.45B. CLS’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $18.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $125.45B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCLS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CLS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both APH and CLS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CLS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the short-term than CLS.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а +3.49% price change this week, while CLS (@Electronic Components) price change was +0.48% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

CLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.43% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($125B) has a higher market cap than CLS($18.7B). APH has higher P/E ratio than CLS: APH (50.34) vs CLS (45.54). CLS YTD gains are higher at: 76.620 vs. APH (49.982). APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 4.27B vs. CLS (746M). CLS has less debt than APH: CLS (942M) vs APH (7.17B). APH has higher revenues than CLS: APH (16.8B) vs CLS (10.1B).
APHCLSAPH / CLS
Capitalization125B18.7B668%
EBITDA4.27B746M573%
Gain YTD49.98276.62065%
P/E Ratio50.3445.54111%
Revenue16.8B10.1B166%
Total CashN/A303M-
Total Debt7.17B942M761%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs CLS: Fundamental Ratings
APH
CLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2682
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
77
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
419
SMR RATING
1..100
3538
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
336
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
258
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APH's Valuation (77) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (80). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (19). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's SMR Rating (35) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as CLS (38). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to CLS’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CLS (36). This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than CLS’s over the last 12 months.

CLS's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (25). This means that CLS’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHCLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BWX23.070.18
+0.79%
SPDR® Blmbg Intl Trs Bd ETF
LOPP30.70N/A
N/A
Gabelli Love Our Planet & People ETF
AREA18.21N/A
N/A
Harbor AlphaEdge Next Generatn REITs ETF
KOCT30.93-0.09
-0.28%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Oct
RSPF76.70-0.42
-0.55%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF