APH
Price
$122.22
Change
-$1.36 (-1.10%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
149.22B
17 days until earnings call
GLW
Price
$83.56
Change
+$1.04 (+1.26%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
71.58B
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH vs GLW

Header iconAPH vs GLW Comparison
Open Charts APH vs GLWBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$122.22
Change-$1.36 (-1.10%)
Volume$6.32M
Capitalization149.22B
Corning
Price$83.56
Change+$1.04 (+1.26%)
Volume$7.74M
Capitalization71.58B
APH vs GLW Comparison Chart in %
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. GLW commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a Buy and GLW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $122.22 vs. GLW: $83.56)
Brand notoriety: APH: Not notable vs. GLW: Notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 74% vs. GLW: 101%
Market capitalization -- APH: $149.22B vs. GLW: $71.58B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $149.22B. GLW’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $71.58B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $149.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $8.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileGLW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • GLW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than GLW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GLW’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • GLW’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GLW is a better buy in the short-term than APH.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while GLW (@Electronic Components) price change was +5.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

GLW is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.24% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($149B) has a higher market cap than GLW($71.6B). GLW has higher P/E ratio than APH: GLW (87.79) vs APH (49.24). GLW (78.574) and APH (76.996) have similar YTD gains . APH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.07B vs. GLW (2.83B). APH has less debt than GLW: APH (8.06B) vs GLW (8.5B). APH has higher revenues than GLW: APH (18.8B) vs GLW (14.2B).
APHGLWAPH / GLW
Capitalization149B71.6B208%
EBITDA5.07B2.83B179%
Gain YTD76.99678.57498%
P/E Ratio49.2487.7956%
Revenue18.8B14.2B132%
Total CashN/A1.49B-
Total Debt8.06B8.5B95%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs GLW: Fundamental Ratings
APH
GLW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8996
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
57
Fair valued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37
SMR RATING
1..100
3178
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
32
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2251
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GLW's Valuation (23) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (57). This means that GLW’s stock grew somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (7). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

APH's SMR Rating (31) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GLW (78). This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than GLW’s over the last 12 months.

GLW's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as APH (3). This means that GLW’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Electronic Components industry is in the same range as GLW (51). This means that APH’s stock grew similarly to GLW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHGLW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GLW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFM51.160.21
+0.42%
Invesco Dividend Achievers™ ETF
IWV380.770.20
+0.05%
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
MSTB39.970.01
+0.01%
LHA Market State Tactical Beta ETF
SCDL38.38N/A
N/A
ETRACS 2x Leveraged US Div Fctr TR ETN
ETQ1.39-0.02
-1.41%
T-REX 2X Inverse Ether Daily Target ETF

APH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APH has been closely correlated with FLEX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APH jumps, then FLEX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APH
1D Price
Change %
APH100%
-1.10%
FLEX - APH
69%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
GLW - APH
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
CLS - APH
65%
Loosely correlated
-6.87%
FN - APH
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.96%
TEL - APH
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More

GLW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GLW has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GLW jumps, then APH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GLW
1D Price
Change %
GLW100%
+1.26%
APH - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
FLEX - GLW
67%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
CLS - GLW
66%
Loosely correlated
-6.87%
SANM - GLW
66%
Loosely correlated
-2.28%
TEL - GLW
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More