APH
Price
$99.46
Change
+$0.94 (+0.95%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
120.31B
18 days until earnings call
TTDKY
Price
$11.40
Change
+$0.23 (+2.06%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
21.6B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APH vs TTDKY

Header iconAPH vs TTDKY Comparison
Open Charts APH vs TTDKYBanner chart's image
Amphenol
Price$99.46
Change+$0.94 (+0.95%)
Volume$3.18M
Capitalization120.31B
TDK
Price$11.40
Change+$0.23 (+2.06%)
Volume$24.8K
Capitalization21.6B
APH vs TTDKY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APH vs. TTDKY commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APH is a StrongBuy and TTDKY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (APH: $99.46 vs. TTDKY: $11.40)
Brand notoriety: APH and TTDKY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Components industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APH: 40% vs. TTDKY: 44%
Market capitalization -- APH: $120.31B vs. TTDKY: $21.6B
APH [@Electronic Components] is valued at $120.31B. TTDKY’s [@Electronic Components] market capitalization is $21.6B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Components] industry ranges from $120.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Components] industry is $6.61B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTTDKY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TTDKY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, APH is a better buy in the long-term than TTDKY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TTDKY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TTDKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TTDKY is a better buy in the short-term than APH.

Price Growth

APH (@Electronic Components) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while TTDKY (@Electronic Components) price change was +2.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Components industry was +1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

APH is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

TTDKY is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Components (+1.58% weekly)

The Electronic Components industry produces electronic equipment for industries and consumer electronics products, such as mobile devices, televisions, and circuit boards. TE Connectivity Ltd, for example, is a company that designs and manufactures connectivity and sensor products for harsh environments in various industries, such as automotive, industrial equipment, aerospace, and oil & gas. Another major player, Corning Inc., makes advanced optics including end-to-end fiber and wireless solutions for communications networks along with various other technologies catering to industrial and scientific applications.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APH($120B) has a higher market cap than TTDKY($21.6B). APH has higher P/E ratio than TTDKY: APH (48.28) vs TTDKY (18.59). APH YTD gains are higher at: 43.836 vs. TTDKY (-12.037). TTDKY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 446B vs. APH (4.27B). APH has less debt than TTDKY: APH (7.17B) vs TTDKY (687B). TTDKY has higher revenues than APH: TTDKY (2.13T) vs APH (16.8B).
APHTTDKYAPH / TTDKY
Capitalization120B21.6B556%
EBITDA4.27B446B1%
Gain YTD43.836-12.037-364%
P/E Ratio48.2818.59260%
Revenue16.8B2.13T1%
Total CashN/A752B-
Total Debt7.17B687B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APH vs TTDKY: Fundamental Ratings
APH
TTDKY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4131
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
587
SMR RATING
1..100
353
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
351
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3793
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TTDKY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APH (78) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Electronic Components industry is significantly better than the same rating for TTDKY (87) in the null industry. This means that APH’s stock grew significantly faster than TTDKY’s over the last 12 months.

TTDKY's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as APH (35) in the Electronic Components industry. This means that TTDKY’s stock grew similarly to APH’s over the last 12 months.

APH's Price Growth Rating (3) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKY (51) in the null industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKY’s over the last 12 months.

APH's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the Electronic Components industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TTDKY (93) in the null industry. This means that APH’s stock grew somewhat faster than TTDKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APHTTDKY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TTDKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBA24.530.27
+1.11%
KraneShares Bosera MSCIChinaA50CntIdETF
QEMM63.680.19
+0.30%
SPDR® MSCI Emerging Mkts StratcFacts ETF
BRHY51.620.15
+0.29%
iShares High Yield Active ETF
DIV17.850.05
+0.28%
Global X SuperDividend™ US ETF
SUB106.270.04
+0.04%
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bd ETF

APH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APH has been closely correlated with CLS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APH jumps, then CLS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APH
1D Price
Change %
APH100%
+0.95%
CLS - APH
73%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
FN - APH
68%
Closely correlated
+2.02%
TEL - APH
68%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
GLW - APH
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.86%
JBL - APH
65%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
More

TTDKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TTDKY has been loosely correlated with MRAAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TTDKY jumps, then MRAAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TTDKY
1D Price
Change %
TTDKY100%
+2.06%
MRAAY - TTDKY
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
HOLO - TTDKY
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.21%
LFUS - TTDKY
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CLS - TTDKY
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
APH - TTDKY
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
More