APLO
Price
$40.68
Change
+$0.68 (+1.70%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
19.23M
FRAF
Price
$37.06
Change
+$0.30 (+0.82%)
Updated
Jul 3, 02:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
113.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APLO vs FRAF

Header iconAPLO vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts APLO vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Apollo Ban
Price$40.68
Change+$0.68 (+1.70%)
Volume$100
Capitalization19.23M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$37.06
Change+$0.30 (+0.82%)
Volume$1.72K
Capitalization113.45M
APLO vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APLO vs. FRAF commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APLO is a Buy and FRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (APLO: $40.68 vs. FRAF: $36.71)
Brand notoriety: APLO and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APLO: 50% vs. FRAF: 70%
Market capitalization -- APLO: $19.23M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
APLO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $19.23M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than APLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APLO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APLO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than APLO.

Price Growth

APLO (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

APLO is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

FRAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.79% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($113M) has a higher market cap than APLO($19.2M). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.920 vs. APLO (23.126).
APLOFRAFAPLO / FRAF
Capitalization19.2M113M17%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD23.12624.92093%
P/E RatioN/A8.33-
RevenueN/A67.3M-
Total CashN/A20.1M-
Total DebtN/A154M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APLO vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
APLO
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
461
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8831
SMR RATING
1..100
6746
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4849
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6916
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APLO's Valuation (31) in the null industry is in the same range as FRAF (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that APLO’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLO (88) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLO’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as APLO (67) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

APLO's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FRAF (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that APLO’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLO (69) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APLOFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
12%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CITZ31.500.65
+2.11%
Citizens Bancshares Corp South Carolina
CIADY20.770.21
+1.02%
China Mengniu Dairy Co., Ltd.
AEDFF73.08N/A
N/A
Aedifica Sicafi, Bruxelles
PZRIF11.02N/A
N/A
Pizza Pizza Royalty Corp.
SVRSF0.09N/A
-1.90%
SILVER STORM MINING LTD.

APLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APLO and PWBK have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APLO and PWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APLO
1D Price
Change %
APLO100%
N/A
PWBK - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
FRAF - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
FPBC - APLO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRCDF - APLO
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVBC - APLO
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.22%
FUNC - FRAF
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
WNEB - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
MRBK - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.81%
FCCO - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
CWBC - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
More