APLO
Price
$42.90
Change
-$1.10 (-2.50%)
Updated
Sep 2 closing price
Capitalization
22.03M
LRCDF
Price
$23.00
Change
+$0.58 (+2.59%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.01B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APLO vs LRCDF

Header iconAPLO vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts APLO vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
Apollo Ban
Price$42.90
Change-$1.10 (-2.50%)
Volume$1.18K
Capitalization22.03M
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$23.00
Change+$0.58 (+2.59%)
Volume$3.85K
Capitalization1.01B
APLO vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APLO vs. LRCDF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APLO is a Hold and LRCDF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (APLO: $42.90 vs. LRCDF: $23.00)
Brand notoriety: APLO and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APLO: 449% vs. LRCDF: 44%
Market capitalization -- APLO: $22.03M vs. LRCDF: $1.01B
APLO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.03M. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APLO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APLO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the long-term than APLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APLO is a better buy in the short-term than LRCDF.

Price Growth

APLO (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.50% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRCDF($1.01B) has a higher market cap than APLO($22M). LRCDF (10.40) and APLO (10.31) have similar P/E ratio . APLO YTD gains are higher at: 29.846 vs. LRCDF (15.173). APLO has less debt than LRCDF: APLO (32.5M) vs LRCDF (15.6B). LRCDF has higher revenues than APLO: LRCDF (985M) vs APLO (9.53M).
APLOLRCDFAPLO / LRCDF
Capitalization22M1.01B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.84615.173197%
P/E Ratio10.3110.4099%
Revenue9.53M985M1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt32.5M15.6B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APLO vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
APLO
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
45
Fair valued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8789
SMR RATING
1..100
7014
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a23

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as APLO (45). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

APLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (89). This means that APLO’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLO (70). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLO’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as APLO (54). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as APLO (68). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APLOLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEMIX42.520.40
+0.95%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity I
WBALX17.160.01
+0.06%
Weitz Conservative Allocation-Inv Cl
IBNYX25.49-0.01
-0.04%
Macquarie Balanced Fund Class Y
PJNQX63.10-0.06
-0.09%
PGIM Jennison Natural Resources R6
PGLOX18.76-0.05
-0.27%
T. Rowe Price Global Consumer

APLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APLO and PWBK have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APLO and PWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APLO
1D Price
Change %
APLO100%
N/A
PWBK - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
FPBC - APLO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRCDF - APLO
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVBC - APLO
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-1.46%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
More