APLO
Price
$39.29
Change
-$1.39 (-3.42%)
Updated
Jul 18 closing price
Capitalization
19.23M
LRCDF
Price
$22.50
Change
-$0.34 (-1.49%)
Updated
Jul 16 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

APLO vs LRCDF

Header iconAPLO vs LRCDF Comparison
Open Charts APLO vs LRCDFBanner chart's image
Apollo Ban
Price$39.29
Change-$1.39 (-3.42%)
Volume$200
Capitalization19.23M
Laurentian Bank of Canada
Price$22.50
Change-$0.34 (-1.49%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.3B
APLO vs LRCDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APLO vs. LRCDF commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APLO is a Hold and LRCDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (APLO: $39.29 vs. LRCDF: $22.50)
Brand notoriety: APLO and LRCDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APLO: 130% vs. LRCDF: 73%
Market capitalization -- APLO: $19.23M vs. LRCDF: $1.3B
APLO [@Regional Banks] is valued at $19.23M. LRCDF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLRCDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • APLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • LRCDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, LRCDF is a better buy in the long-term than APLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APLO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LRCDF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APLO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LRCDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, APLO is a better buy in the short-term than LRCDF.

Price Growth

APLO (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while LRCDF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

APLO is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.50% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LRCDF($1.3B) has a higher market cap than APLO($19.2M). APLO YTD gains are higher at: 18.919 vs. LRCDF (12.669).
APLOLRCDFAPLO / LRCDF
Capitalization19.2M1.3B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD18.91912.669149%
P/E RatioN/A8.54-
RevenueN/A1.03B-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A15.4B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APLO vs LRCDF: Fundamental Ratings
APLO
LRCDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9590
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8993
SMR RATING
1..100
6712
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7457
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LRCDF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as APLO (28). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

APLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as LRCDF (93). This means that APLO’s stock grew similarly to LRCDF’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APLO (67). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APLO’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as APLO (55). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

LRCDF's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as APLO (74). This means that LRCDF’s stock grew similarly to APLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APLOLRCDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
34%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
24%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LRCDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
APHRX35.930.03
+0.08%
Artisan Global Opportunities Instl
GQETX34.23N/A
N/A
GMO Quality III
FICEX16.96N/A
N/A
Frost Growth Equity Inst
JESSX17.84N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Sust Eq S
TINVX25.33N/A
N/A
Thornburg International Growth R4

APLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APLO and PWBK have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APLO and PWBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APLO
1D Price
Change %
APLO100%
N/A
PWBK - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRAF - APLO
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
FPBC - APLO
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LRCDF - APLO
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PVBC - APLO
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More

LRCDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LRCDF and SFBS have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LRCDF and SFBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LRCDF
1D Price
Change %
LRCDF100%
N/A
SFBS - LRCDF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.68%
CATY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
BANR - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.51%
KBCSY - LRCDF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
FFBC - LRCDF
25%
Poorly correlated
+4.28%
More