APMRF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 31 closing price
Capitalization
267.28M
FWFW
Price
$0.61
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 19 closing price
Capitalization
18.03M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APMRF vs FWFW

Header iconAPMRF vs FWFW Comparison
Open Charts APMRF vs FWFWBanner chart's image
Amper SA Madrid
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$10K
Capitalization267.28M
Flywheel Advanced Technology
Price$0.61
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.06K
Capitalization18.03M
APMRF vs FWFW Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APMRF vs. FWFW commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APMRF is a Buy and FWFW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (APMRF: $0.16 vs. FWFW: $0.61)
Brand notoriety: APMRF and FWFW are both not notable
Both companies represent the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APMRF: 121% vs. FWFW: 18%
Market capitalization -- APMRF: $267.28M vs. FWFW: $18.03M
APMRF [@Information Technology Services] is valued at $267.28M. FWFW’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $18.03M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $240.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $10.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APMRF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFWFW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APMRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FWFW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FWFW is a better buy in the long-term than APMRF.

Price Growth

APMRF (@Information Technology Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FWFW (@Information Technology Services) price change was +169.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was +0.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FWFW is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Information Technology Services (+0.41% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APMRF($267M) has a higher market cap than FWFW($18M). APMRF has higher P/E ratio than FWFW: APMRF (53.73) vs FWFW (4.69). FWFW YTD gains are higher at: 204.650 vs. APMRF (45.455). APMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.1M vs. FWFW (-110.43K). APMRF has more cash in the bank: 35.6M vs. FWFW (440K). FWFW has less debt than APMRF: FWFW (544K) vs APMRF (123M). APMRF has higher revenues than FWFW: APMRF (419M) vs FWFW (0).
APMRFFWFWAPMRF / FWFW
Capitalization267M18M1,483%
EBITDA37.1M-110.43K-33,597%
Gain YTD45.455204.65022%
P/E Ratio53.734.691,146%
Revenue419M0-
Total Cash35.6M440K8,091%
Total Debt123M544K22,610%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FWFW: Fundamental Ratings
FWFW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
92
SMR RATING
1..100
92
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
88
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TARK37.191.04
+2.88%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation ETF
QQEW130.02N/A
N/A
First Trust NASDAQ-100 Equal Wtd ETF
FDD15.19N/A
N/A
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Income Fund
PGHY19.55N/A
N/A
Invesco Glb ex-US High Yld Corp Bd ETF
RORO14.43-0.39
-2.65%
ATAC US Rotation ETF

APMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APMRF and FWFW have been poorly correlated (+16% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APMRF and FWFW's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APMRF
1D Price
Change %
APMRF100%
N/A
FWFW - APMRF
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOTE - APMRF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
AUR - APMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
BBAI - APMRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCCN - APMRF
1%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
More

FWFW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FWFW and CCCMF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FWFW and CCCMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FWFW
1D Price
Change %
FWFW100%
N/A
CCCMF - FWFW
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APMRF - FWFW
16%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NTCYF - FWFW
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NOTE - FWFW
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
KD - FWFW
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More