APO
Price
$150.55
Change
-$6.24 (-3.98%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
63.9B
67 days until earnings call
CRBG
Price
$32.70
Change
-$0.79 (-2.36%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
17.89B
79 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

APO vs CRBG

Header iconAPO vs CRBG Comparison
Open Charts APO vs CRBGBanner chart's image
Apollo Global Management
Price$150.55
Change-$6.24 (-3.98%)
Volume$3.73M
Capitalization63.9B
Corebridge Financial
Price$32.70
Change-$0.79 (-2.36%)
Volume$2.51M
Capitalization17.89B
APO vs CRBG Comparison Chart
Loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APO vs. CRBG commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a Hold and CRBG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (APO: $150.55 vs. CRBG: $32.70)
Brand notoriety: APO and CRBG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APO: 69% vs. CRBG: 81%
Market capitalization -- APO: $63.9B vs. CRBG: $17.89B
APO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $63.9B. CRBG’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $17.89B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APO’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileCRBG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • APO’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • CRBG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, APO is a better buy in the long-term than CRBG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRBG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CRBG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both APO and CRBG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.27% price change this week, while CRBG (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

APO is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

CRBG is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APO($63.9B) has a higher market cap than CRBG($17.9B). CRBG has higher P/E ratio than APO: CRBG (16.56) vs APO (13.58). CRBG YTD gains are higher at: 9.255 vs. APO (-8.586). CRBG (171B) and APO (170B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . APO has less debt than CRBG: APO (8.09B) vs CRBG (11.9B). APO has higher revenues than CRBG: APO (32.6B) vs CRBG (19.1B).
APOCRBGAPO / CRBG
Capitalization63.9B17.9B357%
EBITDA6.65BN/A-
Gain YTD-8.5869.255-93%
P/E Ratio13.5816.5682%
Revenue32.6B19.1B171%
Total Cash170B171B99%
Total Debt8.09B11.9B68%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APO: Fundamental Ratings
APO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
69
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4
SMR RATING
1..100
25
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APOCRBG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CRBG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MANU14.46-0.15
-1.03%
Manchester United PLC
RGEN158.99-3.68
-2.26%
Repligen Corp
EHAB8.14-0.30
-3.55%
Enhabit
WHG16.44-0.65
-3.80%
Westwood Holdings Group
CLEU0.09-0.01
-8.99%
China Liberal Education Holdings Limited

CRBG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRBG has been loosely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CRBG jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRBG
1D Price
Change %
CRBG100%
-2.36%
TPG - CRBG
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
APO - CRBG
53%
Loosely correlated
-3.98%
AMP - CRBG
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
CG - CRBG
51%
Loosely correlated
-3.48%
PFG - CRBG
49%
Loosely correlated
-2.52%
More