Apollo Global Management (APO) and Corebridge Financial (CRBG) represent distinct segments within the financial services sector: alternative asset management versus retirement and insurance solutions. This stock comparison evaluates their recent performance, financial metrics, and market positioning amid evolving interest rates and economic uncertainty. Traders seeking momentum plays may favor volatility and growth catalysts, while long-term investors could prioritize dividends and stability. Understanding these contrasts aids in assessing relative performance and sector exposure in today's market environment.
Apollo Global Management (APO) is a leading alternative asset manager focusing on private equity, credit, real estate, and infrastructure, with assets under management spanning diverse strategies like distressed debt and growth equity. In recent weeks, APO shares have rebounded around the $130 level, up over 2% in recent sessions amid anticipation for Q1 earnings. This momentum follows mixed returns, with year-to-date gains of about 9% and a beta of 1.56 indicating higher volatility relative to the market. Sentiment has been bolstered by positive analyst insights on performance measures and valuation signals, despite broader sector pressures. Key influences include robust revenue of $31.8 billion trailing twelve months (TTM) and a profit margin of 11%.
Corebridge Financial (CRBG), spun off from AIG, specializes in retirement solutions including annuities and life insurance across individual, group, and institutional segments. Shares have traded near $27.50 recently, reflecting year-to-date returns of roughly 8% and a lower beta of 1.03 for reduced volatility. Recent market activity shows short-term strength with gains over recent weeks, offset by concerns ahead of Q1 earnings expected to decline. Factors driving sentiment include an attractive forward P/E of 4.63 and dividend yield of 3.52%, though profitability challenges persist with a TTM profit margin of -2% and ROE of -3%.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 AI trading bots curated from over 351 available bots that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots feature impressive stats, including annualized returns up to 164%, win rates ranging from 51% to 88%, and profit factors between 1.48 and 3.33, with average trade durations from 1 day to 50 days. Selected for their suitability in current volatile markets—targeting sectors like semiconductors, AI infrastructure, industrials, and small caps—they employ AI/ML trend trading, technical analysis, and risk-managed exits like take-profit/stop-loss corridors. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge.
APO and CRBG diverge in business models: APO thrives on fee-based alternative investments amid private credit growth, while CRBG relies on insurance spreads sensitive to rates. Growth drivers for APO include scalable AUM (assets under management) expansion, contrasting CRBG's annuity sales. Recent momentum is similar YTD, but APO shows rebound potential with higher beta. Risk factors align with high debt-to-equity ratios near 100%, though CRBG offers income stability. Market sentiment favors APO's profitability versus CRBG's valuation appeal.
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward APO with higher probability due to consistent upward trends, superior profitability metrics like 11% margins and positive ROE, and near-term catalysts from earnings anticipation. CRBG trails on stability but holds appeal for value-oriented plays given its forward valuation and yield. Relative positioning suggests APO for growth-focused traders in the current environment.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRBG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRBG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.57% price change this week, while CRBG (@Investment Managers) price change was +7.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.30%.
APO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
CRBG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | CRBG | APO / CRBG | |
| Capitalization | 77.2B | 13.1B | 589% |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.747 | -3.723 | 181% |
| P/E Ratio | 84.20 | 71.85 | 117% |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 18.4B | 171% |
| Total Cash | 253B | 65.3B | 387% |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 10.9B | 130% |
APO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 64 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| APO | CRBG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 7 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 54% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 19 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 70% | 18 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CRBG has been closely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CRBG jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CRBG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRBG | 100% | +1.91% | ||
| EQH - CRBG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.94% | ||
| KKR - CRBG | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.99% | ||
| BAM - CRBG | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| BN - CRBG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| APO - CRBG | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||