Advertisement
APO vs KKR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Apollo Global Management (APO) vs. KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both APO and KKR are leading alternative asset managers with massive scale, boasting AUM (assets under management) exceeding $600 billion each in fee-generating assets.
- APO has shown stronger recent momentum, gaining about 16% over the past month amid a share rebound and strategic investments, compared to KKR's 11% rise.
- KKR leads year-to-date with 18.5% gains versus APO's 9.5%, driven by robust fundraising like a record $23 billion private equity fund close.
- Upcoming Q1 earnings for both—May 6 for APO and May 5 for KKR—could sway sentiment, with analysts forecasting EPS growth for APO at $1.98.
- Market caps stand at $75 billion for APO and $96 billion for KKR, reflecting similar P/E valuations around 23-44 times trailing earnings.
- Competitive deal pursuits, such as stakes in LNG Canada, highlight overlapping growth in private credit and infrastructure.
Introduction
Apollo Global Management (APO) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) stand as titans in the alternative asset management arena, specializing in private equity, credit, and real assets. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors eyeing exposure to the booming private markets, where AUM growth and fee income drive performance. Traders focused on relative momentum may note recent divergences in price action amid macroeconomic shifts and earnings anticipation. Both firms navigate similar tailwinds like rising private credit demand but face headwinds from interest rate sensitivity and portfolio realizations. Understanding their business models, recent trajectories, and positioning aids in assessing portfolio fit within diversified strategies.
APO Overview and Recent Performance
Apollo Global Management (APO) manages approximately $938 billion in total AUM, including $709 billion in fee-earning assets, with a strong emphasis on credit strategies complemented by private equity and its Athene insurance platform. In recent market activity, APO shares have rebounded sharply, up roughly 16% over the past month to around $130, breaking out from consolidation patterns on TradingView charts. This momentum stems from strategic moves like a $225 million investment in Pickleball Inc. via Apollo Sports Capital and anticipation for Q1 earnings on May 6, projecting EPS of $1.98 and revenue of $1.22 billion. Sentiment has brightened on fee growth prospects, though analysts caution on macroeconomic pressures, with average price targets at $139.
KKR Overview and Recent Performance
KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) oversees about $744 billion in total AUM, with $604 billion fee-earning, spanning private equity, credit, and infrastructure. Recent weeks saw KKR shares climb around 11% monthly to near $104, supported by strong fundraising including a record $23 billion North America private equity fund close. Key developments include bids for UP Education and investments in MLS NEXT Pro, offsetting a prior earnings miss. Q1 results due May 5 highlight long-term growth plans amid revenue volatility concerns. Technicals show neutral ratings with upward short-term trends, bolstered by analyst overweight calls despite lowered targets.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. Only the most suitable for current volatility—25 elite bots—earn a spot, showcasing diverse strategies like trend trading, swing setups, corridors with 3% take-profit/2% stop-loss, and multi-agent systems. Stats impress: annualized returns range from 30% to 163%, win rates 50-88%, profit factors 1.5-7+, with trade durations from hours to weeks across sectors like semiconductors (+68-97%), data centers (+51-87%), and small caps (+93%). These bots employ real-time signals, risk management, and fundamental/technical scans, adapting to market conditions. Explore them for automated insights into dynamic portfolios.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both APO and KKR thrive on similar business models—diversified alternative investments with private credit as a growth engine—but APO leverages its Athene annuity arm for stable fee flows, while KKR emphasizes infrastructure and regional PE funds. Growth drivers include record fundraising for KKR and credit expansion for APO. Recent momentum favors APO's sharper uptrend versus KKR's steadier YTD lead. Risk factors overlap in rate sensitivity and realization timing, with KKR facing more earnings scrutiny post-miss. Sector exposure aligns on alts, but competitive bids like LNG Canada underscore rivalry. Sentiment tilts positive for both on analyst overweight ratings, though APO trades at a lower P/E, signaling relative value.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward APO based on superior recent trend consistency, a 16% monthly gain outpacing KKR, bullish chart breakouts, and catalysts like the Pickleball deal ahead of earnings. KKR offers stability via fundraising but trails in short-term positioning. This probabilistic edge favors APO for momentum traders in the near term.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APO is a StrongBuy and KKR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- APO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- KKR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
APO is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (+1.75% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | KKR | APO / KKR | |
| Capitalization | 68.3B | 83.1B | 82% |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | 9.89B | 78% |
| Gain YTD | -17.592 | -27.732 | 63% |
| P/E Ratio | 85.04 | 32.96 | 258% |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 20.4B | 154% |
| Total Cash | 253B | 132B | 192% |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 54.6B | 26% |
APO | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 75 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 4 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 24 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
KKR's Valuation (80) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (86). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (71). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (92). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (75). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (86). This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 72% | 16 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
Advertisement
APO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
KKR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.