Apollo Global Management (APO) and KKR & Co. (KKR) represent two prominent players in the alternative asset management sector. Investors and traders often compare these stocks due to their similar business models centered on private equity, credit, and infrastructure investments, which are sensitive to interest rates, deal flow, and capital markets activity. This comparison appeals to those evaluating relative performance, fee-related earnings stability, and positioning within a competitive landscape of asset managers. The analysis draws on verifiable market data and recent developments to highlight contrasts in scale, momentum, and catalysts without forward-looking speculation.
Apollo Global Management (APO) operates as a global alternative asset manager with significant focus on credit strategies alongside private equity and real assets. Its business model emphasizes fee-generating assets under management (AUM), which supports recurring revenue. In recent weeks, the stock has shown volatility amid broader financial sector movements, closing at $125.59 on July 31, 2026, after a 4.44% single-day gain. Year-to-date performance reflects a decline in the mid-teens percentage range, influenced by macroeconomic factors and sector rotation. Upcoming second-quarter 2026 earnings on August 4 are anticipated with analyst forecasts of $2.18 EPS and $1.31 billion revenue, providing a near-term catalyst for sentiment. Market positioning remains tied to credit market conditions and deployment of capital.
KKR & Co. (KKR) is a diversified alternative asset manager with substantial operations in private equity, credit, infrastructure, real estate, and insurance solutions. The firm benefits from a large AUM base that drives management fees and performance-related income. Recent market activity includes the July 30, 2026, release of second-quarter results that exceeded consensus estimates, accompanied by announcements of a $16 billion joint venture in Kuwait's oil pipelines. The stock closed at $101.43 on July 31, 2026, with modest intraday gains. Year-to-date returns show a decline approaching 20%, reflecting pressure from higher interest rates and market sentiment. Recent deal activity and earnings momentum have supported relative positioning within the sector.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied market conditions, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with current trends, robust statistics, and suitable strategies earn placement in this focused section. Available bots encompass a wide range of trading styles, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many showing win rates, profit factors, and drawdown profiles that can be reviewed in detail. Users can explore performance statistics and strategy parameters directly on the platform. Visit Trending AI Robots to examine the latest curated options.
Apollo Global Management (APO) and KKR & Co. (KKR) share core exposure to alternative investments but differ in scale and emphasis. KKR maintains a larger market capitalization and broader AUM diversification, including notable insurance and real assets lines, while APO has historically leaned more toward credit solutions. Recent momentum favors KKR following its earnings beat and major infrastructure deal, contrasting with APO’s pre-earnings positioning. Risk factors include sensitivity to credit spreads and regulatory scrutiny for both, with APO showing slightly better year-to-date resilience. Sector sentiment remains cautious amid interest rate volatility, creating trade-offs between KKR’s deal flow visibility and APO’s earnings catalyst potential.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, deal catalysts, and relative price stability, Tickeron’s AI indicates a modest probabilistic preference for KKR in the current environment due to its demonstrated momentum from second-quarter results and infrastructure activity. APO presents a balanced profile ahead of its earnings release, with potential for sentiment shifts depending on outcomes. This assessment reflects pattern recognition in trend and catalyst data rather than definitive positioning.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
APO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.01% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was -2.38% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.54%.
APO is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.
KKR is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.
Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| APO | KKR | APO / KKR | |
| Capitalization | 76B | 93.2B | 82% |
| EBITDA | 7.72B | 9.74B | 79% |
| Gain YTD | -8.042 | -18.088 | 44% |
| P/E Ratio | 46.98 | 33.17 | 142% |
| Revenue | 31.5B | 21.1B | 149% |
| Total Cash | 253B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 14.2B | 54.6B | 26% |
APO | KKR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 24 | 40 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 72 Overvalued | 80 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 67 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 70 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 12 | 94 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APO's Valuation (72) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (80). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
APO's Profit vs Risk Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as KKR (67). This means that APO’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's SMR Rating (70) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (92). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
KKR's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as APO (55). This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to APO’s over the last 12 months.
APO's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (94). This means that APO’s stock grew significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.
| APO | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 56% | 5 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 77% | 5 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 74% | 5 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 73% | 8 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 5 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 53% | 5 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 59% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APO has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APO jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.