APPF
Price
$229.30
Change
-$1.49 (-0.65%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.85B
28 days until earnings call
CLSK
Price
$10.80
Change
+$0.20 (+1.89%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.78B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

APPF vs CLSK

Header iconAPPF vs CLSK Comparison
Open Charts APPF vs CLSKBanner chart's image
AppFolio
Price$229.30
Change-$1.49 (-0.65%)
Volume$1.92K
Capitalization8.85B
CleanSpark
Price$10.80
Change+$0.20 (+1.89%)
Volume$329.74K
Capitalization4.78B
APPF vs CLSK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APPF vs. CLSK commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APPF is a StrongBuy and CLSK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (APPF: $229.29 vs. CLSK: $10.81)
Brand notoriety: APPF and CLSK are both not notable
APPF represents the Packaged Software, while CLSK is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APPF: 64% vs. CLSK: 111%
Market capitalization -- APPF: $8.85B vs. CLSK: $4.78B
APPF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $8.85B. CLSK’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $4.78B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.76B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.19B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCLSK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CLSK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APPF is a better buy in the long-term than CLSK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APPF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLSK’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APPF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLSK’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLSK is a better buy in the short-term than APPF.

Price Growth

APPF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.49% price change this week, while CLSK (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +17.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +9.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +35.94%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +99.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

APPF is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

CLSK is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+9.88% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+3.71% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
APPF($8.85B) has a higher market cap than CLSK($4.78B). CLSK YTD gains are higher at: 17.372 vs. APPF (-7.065). CLSK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 60.4M vs. APPF (30M). APPF has more cash in the bank: 212M vs. CLSK (176M). CLSK has less debt than APPF: CLSK (15.2M) vs APPF (44.7M). APPF has higher revenues than CLSK: APPF (620M) vs CLSK (216M).
APPFCLSKAPPF / CLSK
Capitalization8.85B4.78B185%
EBITDA30M60.4M50%
Gain YTD-7.06517.372-41%
P/E Ratio3446.86N/A-
Revenue620M216M287%
Total Cash212M176M120%
Total Debt44.7M15.2M294%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APPF vs CLSK: Fundamental Ratings
APPF
CLSK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5279
SMR RATING
1..100
2093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9882
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APPF's Valuation (74) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (82) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (79) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's SMR Rating (20) in the Information Technology Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CLSK (93) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew significantly faster than CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

APPF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as CLSK (52) in the null industry. This means that APPF’s stock grew similarly to CLSK’s over the last 12 months.

CLSK's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as APPF (98) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that CLSK’s stock grew similarly to APPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APPFCLSK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLSK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IJS99.551.43
+1.46%
iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
EMO46.750.52
+1.12%
ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund
FIDI23.060.18
+0.79%
Fidelity International High Div ETF
TCHI19.740.09
+0.47%
iShares MSCI China Multisector Tech ETF
BBH152.730.17
+0.11%
VanEck Biotech ETF

APPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPF has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPF jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APPF
1D Price
Change %
APPF100%
-0.65%
CLSK - APPF
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.98%
ADSK - APPF
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.85%
COIN - APPF
43%
Loosely correlated
+5.54%
PTC - APPF
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
OTEX - APPF
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.87%
More

CLSK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLSK has been closely correlated with RIOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLSK jumps, then RIOT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLSK
1D Price
Change %
CLSK100%
+1.98%
RIOT - CLSK
86%
Closely correlated
+5.10%
MARA - CLSK
84%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
BITF - CLSK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
HIVE - CLSK
82%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
COIN - CLSK
77%
Closely correlated
+5.54%
More