It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBAND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BAND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
APPN (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.67% price change this week, while BAND (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
APPN is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
BAND is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APPN | BAND | APPN / BAND | |
Capitalization | 2.78B | 461M | 602% |
EBITDA | -80.9M | 23.2M | -349% |
Gain YTD | -3.266 | 28.334 | -12% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 357.14 | - |
Revenue | 545M | 601M | 91% |
Total Cash | 159M | 153M | 104% |
Total Debt | 277M | 645M | 43% |
APPN | BAND | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APPN's Valuation (78) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BAND (90) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that APPN’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
APPN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BAND (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that APPN’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
BAND's SMR Rating (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as APPN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
APPN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as BAND (46) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that APPN’s stock grew similarly to BAND’s over the last 12 months.
BAND's P/E Growth Rating (88) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as APPN (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that BAND’s stock grew similarly to APPN’s over the last 12 months.
APPN | BAND | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago83% | 3 days ago84% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% | 3 days ago80% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago87% | 3 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago80% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago81% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago81% | 12 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago84% | 3 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% | 3 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago79% | 3 days ago87% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPN has been loosely correlated with CLSK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APPN jumps, then CLSK could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APPN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APPN | 100% | -3.11% | ||
CLSK - APPN | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
COIN - APPN | 55% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
RIOT - APPN | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
HOOD - APPN | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
ONTF - APPN | 50% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAND has been loosely correlated with FLYW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BAND jumps, then FLYW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BAND | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BAND | 100% | -1.38% | ||
FLYW - BAND | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
BIGC - BAND | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
COIN - BAND | 46% Loosely correlated | +9.69% | ||
APPN - BAND | 46% Loosely correlated | -3.11% | ||
CLSK - BAND | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More |