APPS vs HUBS ᐉ Comparison: Which is Better to Invest?
Loading...
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APPS is a StrongBuy and HUBS is a StrongSell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- APPS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HUBS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APPS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- HUBS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
APPS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +21.88% price change this week, while HUBS (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.15%.
Reported Earning Dates
APPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 07, 2024.
HUBS is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+1.87% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| APPS | HUBS | APPS / HUBS | |
| Capitalization | 498M | 23.4B | 2% |
| EBITDA | 73.5M | -88.56M | -83% |
| Gain YTD | -60.892 | 72.168 | -84% |
| P/E Ratio | 63.29 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 592M | 2.06B | 29% |
| Total Cash | 58.1M | 1.6B | 4% |
| Total Debt | 384M | 787M | 49% |
APPS | HUBS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 5 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 41 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 94 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
APPS's Valuation (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as HUBS (86) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that APPS’s stock grew similarly to HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APPS (91) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew somewhat faster than APPS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's SMR Rating (94) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as APPS (96) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to APPS’s over the last 12 months.
HUBS's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as APPS (63) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that HUBS’s stock grew similarly to APPS’s over the last 12 months.
APPS's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HUBS (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that APPS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HUBS’s over the last 12 months.
| APPS | HUBS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 65% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 1 day ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
APPS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPS has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APPS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APPS | 100% | +3.47% | ||
| COIN - APPS | 67% Closely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| CLSK - APPS | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.81% | ||
| RIOT - APPS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.51% | ||
| HUBS - APPS | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| PATH - APPS | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.31% | ||
More | ||||