It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APPS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePLGGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APPS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
APPS (@Packaged Software) experienced а -10.27% price change this week, while PLGGF (@Packaged Software) price change was +47.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
APPS is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
APPS | PLGGF | APPS / PLGGF | |
Capitalization | 267M | N/A | - |
EBITDA | 55.3M | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -80.904 | -56.682 | 143% |
P/E Ratio | 63.29 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 572M | N/A | - |
Total Cash | 49M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 374M | N/A | - |
APPS | PLGGF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 66 Overvalued | 55 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 28 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
PLGGF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as APPS (66) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that PLGGF’s stock grew similarly to APPS’s over the last 12 months.
PLGGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as APPS (100) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that PLGGF’s stock grew similarly to APPS’s over the last 12 months.
APPS's SMR Rating (97) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that APPS’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
PLGGF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APPS (97) in the Internet Software Or Services industry. This means that PLGGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APPS’s over the last 12 months.
APPS's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the Internet Software Or Services industry is in the same range as PLGGF (100) in the null industry. This means that APPS’s stock grew similarly to PLGGF’s over the last 12 months.
APPS | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago80% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago86% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago88% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago89% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago84% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago85% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NPNRX | 47.31 | -0.09 | -0.19% |
Neuberger Berman Large Cap Value R3 | |||
FMPAX | 33.51 | -0.19 | -0.56% |
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value A | |||
GSAFX | 21.44 | -0.14 | -0.65% |
Goldman Sachs China Equity R6 | |||
HNDRX | 76.82 | -0.67 | -0.86% |
Horizon Defined Risk Investor | |||
NWADX | 20.33 | -0.43 | -2.07% |
Nationwide Loomis All Cap Gr Eagle |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APPS has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if APPS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To APPS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
APPS | 100% | -6.43% | ||
COIN - APPS | 67% Closely correlated | +9.69% | ||
CLSK - APPS | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
RIOT - APPS | 62% Loosely correlated | +4.26% | ||
HCAT - APPS | 57% Loosely correlated | -9.47% | ||
KVYO - APPS | 53% Loosely correlated | -4.84% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that PLGGF and RDVT have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PLGGF and RDVT's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PLGGF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PLGGF | 100% | N/A | ||
RDVT - PLGGF | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
HCAT - PLGGF | 29% Poorly correlated | -9.47% | ||
APPS - PLGGF | 29% Poorly correlated | -6.43% | ||
KVYO - PLGGF | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.84% | ||
MRT - PLGGF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |