APRAF
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
8.2M
MGMLF
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
34.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

APRAF vs MGMLF

Header iconAPRAF vs MGMLF Comparison
Open Charts APRAF vs MGMLFBanner chart's image
Trailbreaker Resources
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$29K
Capitalization8.2M
Maple Gold Mines
Price$0.08
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$432.67K
Capitalization34.51M
APRAF vs MGMLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
APRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APRAF vs. MGMLF commentary
Aug 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APRAF is a Hold and MGMLF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2025
Stock price -- (APRAF: $0.20 vs. MGMLF: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: APRAF and MGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APRAF: 148% vs. MGMLF: 163%
Market capitalization -- APRAF: $8.2M vs. MGMLF: $34.51M
APRAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $8.2M. MGMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $34.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $77.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.52B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MGMLF is a better buy in the long-term than APRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APRAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGMLF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APRAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGMLF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MGMLF is a better buy in the short-term than APRAF.

Price Growth

APRAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +4.15% price change this week, while MGMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was +38.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +1.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.78%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4558.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+1.05% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMLF($34.5M) has a higher market cap than APRAF($8.2M). MGMLF YTD gains are higher at: 103.481 vs. APRAF (-6.428). APRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -486.9K vs. MGMLF (-5.4M). MGMLF has more cash in the bank: 5.41M vs. APRAF (1.47M). APRAF (0) and MGMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
APRAFMGMLFAPRAF / MGMLF
Capitalization8.2M34.5M24%
EBITDA-486.9K-5.4M9%
Gain YTD-6.428103.481-6%
P/E Ratio27.87N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.47M5.41M27%
Total DebtN/A263K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APRAF vs MGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
APRAF
MGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1379
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9199
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
87100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a90

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APRAF's Valuation (74) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (87). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (99). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

MGMLF's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for APRAF (86). This means that MGMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than APRAF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's P/E Growth Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APRAFMGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
APRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IOVA2.690.15
+5.91%
Iovance Biotherapeutics
DHI170.688.81
+5.44%
DR Horton
WALD1.730.09
+5.17%
Waldencast plc
AB40.200.67
+1.69%
AllianceBernstein Holding LP
JL5.82N/A
N/A
J-Long Group Limited

APRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APRAF and FSM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APRAF and FSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APRAF
1D Price
Change %
APRAF100%
+4.64%
FSM - APRAF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.72%
THM - APRAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+10.16%
NSUPF - APRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.17%
MGMLF - APRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.26%
NFGC - APRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More

MGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMLF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMLF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMLF
1D Price
Change %
MGMLF100%
-0.26%
GSISF - MGMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-11.06%
APRAF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+4.64%
GGLDF - MGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.55%
WRLGF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.22%
DTARF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.69%
More