APRAF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
MGMLF
Price
$0.04
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
Ad is loading...

APRAF vs MGMLF

Header iconAPRAF vs MGMLF Comparison
Open Charts APRAF vs MGMLFBanner chart's image
Trailbreaker Resources
Price$0.21
Change+$0.02 (+10.53%)
Volume$20.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Maple Gold Mines
Price$0.04
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$50.4K
CapitalizationN/A
APRAF vs MGMLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
APRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
APRAF vs. MGMLF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APRAF is a Hold and MGMLF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (APRAF: $0.21 vs. MGMLF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: APRAF and MGMLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: APRAF: 90% vs. MGMLF: 35%
Market capitalization -- APRAF: $7.16M vs. MGMLF: $33.26M
APRAF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $7.16M. MGMLF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $33.26M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

APRAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • APRAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, APRAF is a better buy in the long-term than MGMLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

APRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGMLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • APRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MGMLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both APRAF and MGMLF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

APRAF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -4.96% price change this week, while MGMLF (@Precious Metals) price change was -6.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGMLF($33.3M) has a higher market cap than APRAF($7.16M). MGMLF YTD gains are higher at: -28.648 vs. APRAF (-42.844). APRAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -448.22K vs. MGMLF (-10.27M). MGMLF has more cash in the bank: 8.54M vs. APRAF (1.14M). APRAF (0) and MGMLF (0) have equivalent revenues.
APRAFMGMLFAPRAF / MGMLF
Capitalization7.16M33.3M22%
EBITDA-448.22K-10.27M4%
Gain YTD-42.844-28.648150%
P/E Ratio5.58N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.14M8.54M13%
Total DebtN/A440K-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
APRAF vs MGMLF: Fundamental Ratings
APRAF
MGMLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1854
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8284
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
96100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

APRAF's Valuation (55) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (87). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (98). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's Price Growth Rating (82) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (84). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

APRAF's P/E Growth Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as MGMLF (100). This means that APRAF’s stock grew similarly to MGMLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
APRAFMGMLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
APRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGMLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MELI1809.1212.40
+0.69%
MercadoLibre
AADI2.390.01
+0.42%
Aadi Bioscience
ESQ77.75-1.01
-1.28%
Esquire Financial Holdings
ZION56.22-1.42
-2.46%
Zions Bancorporation NA
BBU22.85-0.65
-2.77%
Brookfield Business Partners LPLimited Partnership Units

APRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that APRAF and FSM have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that APRAF and FSM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To APRAF
1D Price
Change %
APRAF100%
-13.38%
FSM - APRAF
27%
Poorly correlated
-0.86%
THM - APRAF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.66%
SASKF - APRAF
25%
Poorly correlated
-3.06%
MTA - APRAF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.72%
NSUPF - APRAF
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.08%
More

MGMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MGMLF and GSISF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MGMLF and GSISF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGMLF
1D Price
Change %
MGMLF100%
+2.18%
GSISF - MGMLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
APRAF - MGMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
-13.38%
GGLDF - MGMLF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.00%
JNCCF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+6.00%
WRLGF - MGMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
More