Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQLGX vs CGFAX
AQLGX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts AQLGX vs CGFAX
Alta Quality Growth Institutional
Price$18.32
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets53.65M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$87.57
Change-$0.13 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.07B
AQLGX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQLGX vs. CGFAX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQLGX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 343B vs. AQLGX (53.7M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than AQLGX: CGFAX (0.31) vs AQLGX (0.02). AQLGX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: AQLGX (7 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). AQLGX (1.15) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). AQLGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AQLGX: CGFAX (250) vs AQLGX (2500). CGFAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.71 vs. AQLGX (1.40). CGFAX return over 5 years is better than : 42.50 vs. AQLGX (28.59).
| AQLGX | CGFAX | AQLGX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.15 | 0.65 | 177% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.814 | 19.697 | 50% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 53.7M | 343B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 0.31 | 6% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.40 | 13.71 | 10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.84 | 78.03 | 56% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.59 | 42.50 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 110.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement