Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQMNX vs LFMAX
AQMNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQMNX vs. LFMAX commentary
Aug 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AQMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.09B vs. LFMAX (1.52B). AQMNX pays higher dividends than LFMAX: AQMNX (3.48) vs LFMAX (2.94). AQMNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AQMNX (16 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). AQMNX (2.99) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). AQMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 605.00 vs. LFMAX (90.00). AQMNX (2500) and LFMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AQMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.32 vs. LFMAX (1.31). AQMNX return over 5 years is better than : 49.54 vs. LFMAX (1.20).
| AQMNX | LFMAX | AQMNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.13 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 2.13 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.783 | -0.916 | -413% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.09B | 1.52B | 137% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.48 | 2.94 | 119% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.32 | 1.31 | 942% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.02 | -9.96 | -211% |
| Returns for 5 years | 49.54 | 1.20 | 4,120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.49 | 7.85 | 287% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement