Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQMNX vs LFMAX
AQMNX vs LFMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQMNX vs. LFMAX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMNX is a Hold and LFMAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AQMNX has more cash in the bank: 2.15B vs. LFMAX (1.53B). AQMNX pays higher dividends than LFMAX: AQMNX (3.44) vs LFMAX (2.93). AQMNX was incepted earlier than LFMAX: AQMNX (16 years) vs LFMAX (14 years). AQMNX (2.99) is less costly to investors than LFMAX (2.13). AQMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 605.00 vs. LFMAX (90.00). AQMNX (2500) and LFMAX (2500) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AQMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.00 vs. LFMAX (0.80). AQMNX return over 5 years is better than : 56.80 vs. LFMAX (3.18).
| AQMNX | LFMAX | AQMNX / LFMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.97 | 2.13 | 139% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.99 | 2.13 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.792 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2500 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.15B | 1.53B | 141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.44 | 2.93 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.00 | 0.80 | 1,497% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | -11.55 | -146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 56.80 | 3.18 | 1,786% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.04 | 11.36 | 203% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement