AQMS
Price
$0.17
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
25 days until earnings call
MEG
Price
$22.55
Change
+$0.92 (+4.25%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
30 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AQMS vs MEG

Header iconAQMS vs MEG Comparison
Open Charts AQMS vs MEGBanner chart's image
Aqua Metals
Price$0.17
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$937.33K
CapitalizationN/A
Montrose Environmental Group
Price$22.55
Change+$0.92 (+4.25%)
Volume$824.25K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
AQMS vs MEG Comparison Chart
Loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
AQMS vs. MEG commentary
Oct 07, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQMS is a Sell and MEG is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 07, 2024
Stock price -- (AQMS: $0.17 vs. MEG: $22.55)
Brand notoriety: AQMS and MEG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AQMS: 159% vs. MEG: 152%
Market capitalization -- AQMS: $79.15M vs. MEG: $1.19B
AQMS [@Environmental Services] is valued at $79.15M. MEG’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $1.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AQMS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMEG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AQMS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MEG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MEG is a better buy in the long-term than AQMS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AQMS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MEG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AQMS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MEG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both AQMS and MEG are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

AQMS (@Environmental Services) experienced а -14.55% price change this week, while MEG (@Environmental Services) price change was -17.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

AQMS is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.

MEG is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+2.03% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MEG($1.2B) has a higher market cap than AQMS($79.2M). MEG YTD gains are higher at: -29.816 vs. AQMS (-77.829). MEG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 31.9M vs. AQMS (-16.17M). AQMS has more cash in the bank: 25.6M vs. MEG (23.2M). AQMS has less debt than MEG: AQMS (3.3M) vs MEG (210M). MEG has higher revenues than AQMS: MEG (624M) vs AQMS (25K).
AQMSMEGAQMS / MEG
Capitalization79.2M1.2B7%
EBITDA-16.17M31.9M-51%
Gain YTD-77.829-29.816261%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue25K624M0%
Total Cash25.6M23.2M110%
Total Debt3.3M210M2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AQMS vs MEG: Fundamental Ratings
AQMS
MEG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5151
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9893
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9592
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MEG's Valuation (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AQMS (97) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew somewhat faster than AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (98) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's Price Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (95) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

MEG's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AQMS (100) in the Environmental Services industry. This means that MEG’s stock grew similarly to AQMS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AQMSMEG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AQMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
MEG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SUVZX14.530.16
+1.11%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Val Z
TWGIX60.200.63
+1.06%
American Century Growth I
BGEAX31.690.28
+0.89%
Brandes Global Equity A
BINSX14.420.09
+0.63%
Baillie Gifford International Alpha I
IMLPX9.710.05
+0.52%
MainGate MLP I

AQMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AQMS and CWST have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AQMS and CWST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AQMS
1D Price
Change %
AQMS100%
-0.82%
CWST - AQMS
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
MEG - AQMS
21%
Poorly correlated
+4.25%
SRCL - AQMS
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.11%
PESI - AQMS
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
NVRI - AQMS
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.26%
More

MEG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MEG has been loosely correlated with CLH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MEG jumps, then CLH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MEG
1D Price
Change %
MEG100%
+4.25%
CLH - MEG
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
NVRI - MEG
35%
Loosely correlated
+3.26%
CWST - MEG
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
GFL - MEG
24%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
LICY - MEG
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.21%
More