Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AQWA vs BATT
AQWA vs BATT Comparison
Open Charts AQWA vs BATT
Global X Clean Water ETF
Price$19.82
Change+$0.18 (+0.92%)
Volume$362
Net Assets11.91M
Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF
Price$10.81
Change+$0.14 (+1.31%)
Volume$102
Net Assets66.17M
AQWA vs BATT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AQWA vs. BATT commentary
Aug 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AQWA is a Buy and BATT is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BATT has more net assets: 66.2M vs. AQWA (11.9M). BATT has a higher annual dividend yield than AQWA: BATT (21.250) vs AQWA (17.358). AQWA was incepted earlier than BATT: AQWA (4 years) vs BATT (7 years). AQWA (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than BATT (0.59). BATT has a higher turnover AQWA (10.48) vs AQWA (10.48).
| AQWA | BATT | AQWA / BATT | |
| Gain YTD | 17.358 | 21.250 | 82% |
| Net Assets | 11.9M | 66.2M | 18% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.59 | 85% |
| Turnover | 10.48 | 69.00 | 15% |
| Yield | 1.35 | 2.82 | 48% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AQWA | BATT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 79% | 13 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AQWA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AQWA has been loosely correlated with HTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AQWA jumps, then HTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AQWA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AQWA | 100% | +1.64% | ||
| HTO - AQWA | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| WTTR - AQWA | 29% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| YORW - AQWA | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.01% | ||
| AWR - AQWA | 16% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| AWK - AQWA | 13% Poorly correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
BATT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BATT has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BATT jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BATT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BATT | 100% | +0.76% | ||
| BHP - BATT | 75% Closely correlated | +1.37% | ||
| ALB - BATT | 71% Closely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| SQM - BATT | 70% Closely correlated | -0.31% | ||
| PLL - BATT | 66% Closely correlated | -9.49% | ||
| SGML - BATT | 64% Loosely correlated | +14.34% | ||
More | ||||