ARBFF
Price
$24.92
Change
-$0.33 (-1.31%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
1.72B
QS
Price
$5.67
Change
+$1.34 (+30.95%)
Updated
Jun 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.04B
27 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARBFF vs QS

Header iconARBFF vs QS Comparison
Open Charts ARBFF vs QSBanner chart's image
ARB
Price$24.92
Change-$0.33 (-1.31%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization1.72B
QuantumScape
Price$5.67
Change+$1.34 (+30.95%)
Volume$178.81M
Capitalization3.04B
ARBFF vs QS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARBFF vs. QS commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARBFF is a Hold and QS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (ARBFF: $24.92 vs. QS: $5.67)
Brand notoriety: ARBFF and QS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARBFF: 100% vs. QS: 1164%
Market capitalization -- ARBFF: $1.72B vs. QS: $3.04B
ARBFF [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $1.72B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.04B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARBFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARBFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARBFF is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QS’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

ARBFF (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +29.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.52%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.64% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than ARBFF($1.72B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 9.249 vs. ARBFF (0.000). ARBFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164M vs. QS (-392.95M). QS has more cash in the bank: 1.07B vs. ARBFF (52.7M). ARBFF has less debt than QS: ARBFF (38M) vs QS (101M). ARBFF has higher revenues than QS: ARBFF (676M) vs QS (0).
ARBFFQSARBFF / QS
Capitalization1.72B3.04B57%
EBITDA164M-392.95M-42%
Gain YTD0.0009.249-
P/E Ratio23.20N/A-
Revenue676M0-
Total Cash52.7M1.07B5%
Total Debt38M101M38%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARBFF: Fundamental Ratings
ARBFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
49
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
49
SMR RATING
1..100
50
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UGL35.230.22
+0.63%
ProShares Ultra Gold
AAWEX16.46N/A
N/A
Cavanal Hill World Energy A
BRWAX25.68N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Growth Eq A
CFXRX14.27N/A
N/A
Columbia Flexible Capital Income Inst2
IYG83.86-0.01
-0.01%
iShares US Financial Services ETF

ARBFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARBFF and EXCOF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARBFF and EXCOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARBFF
1D Price
Change %
ARBFF100%
N/A
EXCOF - ARBFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
WKSP - ARBFF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
QS - ARBFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+30.95%
SMTOY - ARBFF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.48%
YORUF - ARBFF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with AEVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then AEVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+30.95%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
HYLN - QS
38%
Loosely correlated
-3.60%
GGR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
LIDR - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.75%
THRM - QS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More