It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARCVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBOUYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARCVF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BOUYF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARCVF (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while BOUYF (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -5.26% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.66%.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
ARCVF | BOUYF | ARCVF / BOUYF | |
Capitalization | 5.68B | 11.3B | 50% |
EBITDA | 530M | 5.22B | 10% |
Gain YTD | 19.300 | -23.912 | -81% |
P/E Ratio | 27.41 | 10.52 | 261% |
Revenue | 5.04B | 56.4B | 9% |
Total Cash | 259M | 3.27B | 8% |
Total Debt | 1.29B | 15B | 9% |
ARCVF | BOUYF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 92 | 93 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 75 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 79 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BOUYF's Valuation (9) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ARCVF (81). This means that BOUYF’s stock grew significantly faster than ARCVF’s over the last 12 months.
ARCVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BOUYF (100). This means that ARCVF’s stock grew significantly faster than BOUYF’s over the last 12 months.
BOUYF's SMR Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as ARCVF (80). This means that BOUYF’s stock grew similarly to ARCVF’s over the last 12 months.
ARCVF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as BOUYF (79). This means that ARCVF’s stock grew similarly to BOUYF’s over the last 12 months.
ARCVF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as BOUYF (79). This means that ARCVF’s stock grew similarly to BOUYF’s over the last 12 months.
ARCVF | BOUYF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago42% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago33% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago29% | 2 days ago41% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago28% | 2 days ago38% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago34% | 2 days ago42% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago38% | 2 days ago36% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago39% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago48% | 2 days ago26% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
HSGFX | 5.50 | 0.03 | +0.55% |
Hussman Strategic Market Cycle Fund | |||
IGISX | 22.61 | -0.10 | -0.44% |
Voya Growth and Income Port S2 | |||
WSCOX | 13.75 | -0.18 | -1.29% |
Allspring Disciplined Small Cap Inst | |||
DFSTX | 50.90 | -0.69 | -1.34% |
DFA US Small Cap I | |||
DSMZX | 11.12 | -0.16 | -1.42% |
Destinations Small-Mid Cap Equity Z |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ARCVF and AEGXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARCVF and AEGXF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARCVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ARCVF | 100% | N/A | ||
AEGXF - ARCVF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.21% | ||
CHYCY - ARCVF | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BCKIY - ARCVF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BOUYF - ARCVF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BIRDF - ARCVF | 11% Poorly correlated | -2.54% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BOUYF and EFGSY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BOUYF and EFGSY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BOUYF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BOUYF | 100% | N/A | ||
EFGSY - BOUYF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
BOUYY - BOUYF | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
ARCVF - BOUYF | 11% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
CCOHF - BOUYF | 7% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BCKIF - BOUYF | 6% Poorly correlated | -10.03% | ||
More |