ARES
Price
$118.04
Change
-$12.55 (-9.61%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
25.71B
19 days until earnings call
ICGUF
Price
$25.96
Change
-$1.18 (-4.35%)
Updated
Mar 12 closing price
Capitalization
5.25B
Ad is loading...

ARES vs ICGUF

Header iconARES vs ICGUF Comparison
Open Charts ARES vs ICGUFBanner chart's image
Ares Management
Price$118.04
Change-$12.55 (-9.61%)
Volume$7.65M
Capitalization25.71B
Intermediate Capital Group
Price$25.96
Change-$1.18 (-4.35%)
Volume$668
Capitalization5.25B
ARES vs ICGUF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARES vs. ICGUF commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Buy and ICGUF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (ARES: $118.04 vs. ICGUF: $25.96)
Brand notoriety: ARES and ICGUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARES: 412% vs. ICGUF: 142%
Market capitalization -- ARES: $25.71B vs. ICGUF: $5.25B
ARES [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.71B. ICGUF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $5.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARES’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileICGUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARES’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • ICGUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARES is a better buy in the long-term than ICGUF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARES’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARES’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -18.54% price change this week, while ICGUF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARES($25.7B) has a higher market cap than ICGUF($5.25B). ARES has higher P/E ratio than ICGUF: ARES (54.71) vs ICGUF (17.51). ICGUF YTD gains are higher at: -4.335 vs. ARES (-32.801). ARES has more cash in the bank: 1.5B vs. ICGUF (183M). ICGUF has less debt than ARES: ICGUF (6.11B) vs ARES (15.8B). ARES has higher revenues than ICGUF: ARES (4.99B) vs ICGUF (447M).
ARESICGUFARES / ICGUF
Capitalization25.7B5.25B490%
EBITDA2.43BN/A-
Gain YTD-32.801-4.335757%
P/E Ratio54.7117.51312%
Revenue4.99B447M1,116%
Total Cash1.5B183M819%
Total Debt15.8B6.11B259%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARES vs ICGUF: Fundamental Ratings
ARES
ICGUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3350
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
22
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2776
SMR RATING
1..100
9291
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8653
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3487
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ICGUF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is in the same range as ARES (29) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (27) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICGUF (76) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as ARES (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ICGUF’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ICGUF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that ICGUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.

ARES's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ICGUF (87) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew somewhat faster than ICGUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARES
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARES
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMBO2.870.39
+15.52%
Ambow Education Holding Ltd
ABCL2.09N/A
N/A
AbCellera Biologics
KOD2.35-0.05
-2.08%
Kodiak Sciences
INSM69.18-4.15
-5.66%
Insmed
ARLP25.04-1.62
-6.08%
Alliance Resource Partners LP

ICGUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ICGUF and NINTF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ICGUF and NINTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ICGUF
1D Price
Change %
ICGUF100%
N/A
NINTF - ICGUF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - ICGUF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - ICGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-8.10%
ARES - ICGUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-9.61%
IVSXF - ICGUF
14%
Poorly correlated
-8.88%
More