ARKW
Price
$148.17
Change
-$1.37 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jul 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.76B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMH
Price
$611.03
Change
+$3.30 (+0.54%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Net Assets
73.71B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKW vs SMH

ARKW vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) vs. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH)

Key Takeaways

  • ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an actively managed thematic fund targeting next-generation internet and disruptive innovation companies, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive ETF tracking a semiconductor industry index.
  • ARKW typically holds 35–55 securities with a broad thematic focus across technology services and related sectors, whereas SMH concentrates on approximately 25 semiconductor firms, resulting in higher concentration risk but deeper sector specificity.
  • ARKW carries a higher expense ratio of 0.76% compared to SMH’s 0.35%, reflecting its active management structure versus SMH’s lower-cost passive replication approach.
  • Both ETFs provide technology exposure but differ significantly in risk profiles: ARKW offers diversified thematic bets with potential for higher volatility due to active stock selection, while SMH delivers concentrated semiconductor exposure tied to chip demand cycles.
  • Structural differences position ARKW as a growth-oriented thematic vehicle and SMH as a cost-efficient, benchmark-driven tool for semiconductor sector participation.
  • Relative positioning favors lower-cost, focused strategies like SMH in environments emphasizing sector momentum and efficiency, while ARKW suits investors seeking active management in broader innovation themes.

Introduction

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) attract investor attention as distinct vehicles within the technology space. ARKW pursues active management of next-generation internet themes, while SMH provides passive exposure to the semiconductor industry. These ETFs do not compete directly but offer alternative strategies for investors seeking technology-driven growth, with ARKW emphasizing thematic disruption and SMH targeting specialized hardware supply chains. Comparing their structures helps clarify trade-offs in cost, concentration, and thematic breadth amid ongoing semiconductor and digital innovation trends.

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) Overview

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an actively managed thematic exchange-traded fund launched in 2014 that seeks long-term capital growth by investing primarily in equity securities of companies relevant to the next-generation internet theme. The fund typically maintains 35–55 holdings and allocates across technology services and electronic technology sectors. Its expense ratio stands at 0.76%. As an actively managed product from ARK Invest, ARKW employs discretionary security selection and periodic rebalancing based on fundamental research rather than a fixed index. Key distinguishing features include its non-diversified structure and focus on innovative, high-growth companies, which can lead to concentrated positions in select names.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. Launched in 2000, the fund holds approximately 25 securities, with heavy weighting toward leading semiconductor producers and equipment makers. Its expense ratio is 0.35%. SMH operates as a non-diversified fund with low portfolio turnover and straightforward index replication methodology. Top holdings typically include major chip designers and manufacturers, resulting in a concentrated yet sector-specific profile focused almost entirely on information technology, particularly semiconductors.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor and broader technology sectors continue to experience structural demand driven by artificial intelligence, data center expansion, and advanced computing needs. Capital flows have favored semiconductor supply chains amid global chip production investments, while regulatory developments around export controls and supply chain resilience influence positioning. Macroeconomic drivers such as interest rate expectations and corporate capital expenditure cycles affect both themes, with innovation in internet infrastructure supporting ARKW’s focus and sustained chip demand underpinning SMH. Sector risks include geopolitical tensions affecting manufacturing and potential cyclical slowdowns in electronics spending.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has demonstrated strong relative positioning tied to semiconductor earnings momentum and AI-related capital spending, benefiting from its concentrated exposure to high-growth chip leaders. ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) has shown more variable performance reflecting active thematic bets across internet and adjacent innovations, with greater sensitivity to broader growth stock rotations. Volatility differences arise from SMH’s narrow sector focus versus ARKW’s wider thematic dispersion, influencing how each responds to interest rate shifts and earnings seasons. Relative positioning highlights SMH’s efficiency in capturing semiconductor-specific trends, while ARKW offers exposure to evolving digital infrastructure narratives.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKW and SMH may find the tool useful for refining their research process.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI would likely favor VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) at present due to its lower expense ratio, passive structure, focused semiconductor exposure aligned with observable sector momentum, and strong diversification profile within its targeted industry. ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) offers active thematic flexibility but carries higher costs and broader risk dispersion. This assessment rests on structural efficiency, cost advantages, and trend consistency rather than short-term fluctuations.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARKW vs. SMH commentary
Jul 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARKW is a Buy and SMH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 73.7B vs. ARKW (1.76B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than ARKW: SMH (69.669) vs ARKW (0.467). ARKW was incepted earlier than SMH: ARKW (12 years) vs SMH (15 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than ARKW (0.76). ARKW has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
ARKWSMHARKW / SMH
Gain YTD0.46769.6691%
Net Assets1.76B73.7B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.760.35217%
Turnover44.0012.00367%
Yield1.620.17964%
Fund Existence12 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKWSMH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARKW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CADHKD5.650.12
+2.14%
Canadian Dollar - Hong Kong Dollar
JPYNZD0.010.00
+1.66%
Japan Yen - New Zealand Dollar
USDNZD1.750.01
+0.55%
United States Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
GBPHKD10.38-0.13
-1.20%
United Kingdom Pound - Hong Kong Dollar
CNYHKD1.13-0.02
-1.87%
China Yuan - Hong Kong Dollar

ARKW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKW has been loosely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARKW jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKW
1D Price
Change %
ARKW100%
-0.75%
OPEN - ARKW
65%
Loosely correlated
-10.09%
SE - ARKW
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
XYZ - ARKW
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
TSM - ARKW
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
FIRY - ARKW
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.06%
More

SMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMH
1D Price
Change %
SMH100%
+0.54%
LRCX - SMH
88%
Closely correlated
-0.80%
KLAC - SMH
85%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
AMAT - SMH
83%
Closely correlated
+2.35%
ASML - SMH
82%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
MPWR - SMH
80%
Closely correlated
-1.56%
More