ARKW
Price
$156.34
Change
-$1.72 (-1.09%)
Updated
Sep 9, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
1.84B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLK
Price
$187.87
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Net Assets
122.46B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARKW vs XLK

ARKW vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) vs. Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK)

Key Takeaways

  • ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an actively managed thematic fund targeting next-generation internet and disruptive technologies, while Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) is a passive ETF tracking the broad U.S. technology sector.
  • ARKW typically holds 35–55 securities with concentrated exposure to high-growth themes, whereas XLK maintains approximately 75 holdings diversified across large-cap technology leaders.
  • Expense ratios differ significantly: ARKW charges 0.76%, reflecting active management, compared with XLK’s low 0.08% passive structure.
  • Sector exposure in ARKW spans technology, consumer discretionary, and financials with thematic tilts, while XLK delivers 100% allocation to the information technology sector.
  • ARKW’s active rebalancing and stock selection introduce higher volatility and potential for outperformance in innovation-driven cycles, whereas XLK offers lower costs and more stable sector-beta exposure.
  • Investors seeking broad, cost-efficient technology exposure may prefer XLK, while those targeting disruptive internet and artificial intelligence themes may consider ARKW despite elevated fees.

Introduction

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) and Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) both provide exposure to the technology sector yet pursue markedly different strategies. ARKW employs active management to capture companies reshaping internet infrastructure, cloud computing, and emerging digital services. XLK delivers passive, rules-based exposure to the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. These ETFs do not compete directly; instead, they represent alternative approaches to technology investing—one thematic and concentrated, the other broad and benchmark-oriented—allowing investors to align portfolios with specific risk tolerances and market views.

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) Overview

ARK Next Generation Internet ETF (ARKW) is an actively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities of companies relevant to the next-generation internet theme. The fund typically maintains 35–55 holdings and features an expense ratio of 0.76%. Top positions often include Tesla Inc. (TSLA) and Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), with allocations extending into consumer discretionary and financial services alongside core technology names. ARKW follows an active rebalancing methodology driven by fundamental research rather than a fixed index. Its non-diversified structure and thematic focus distinguish it from traditional sector funds, emphasizing high-conviction bets on artificial intelligence, blockchain, and digital platforms.

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) Overview

Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK) is a passively managed exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the S&P Technology Select Sector Index. The fund holds approximately 75 securities, with an expense ratio of 0.08%. Leading holdings typically feature NVIDIA Corp. (NVDA), Apple Inc. (AAPL), and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), representing a concentrated yet diversified large-cap technology universe. XLK maintains 100% exposure to the information technology sector and employs quarterly index reconstitution for rebalancing. Its low-cost, rules-based structure provides straightforward, transparent access to established technology leaders without active stock selection.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The technology sector continues to benefit from sustained demand for artificial intelligence infrastructure, cloud migration, and semiconductor innovation. Regulatory scrutiny around data privacy, antitrust enforcement, and export controls remains a key risk factor. Macroeconomic drivers including interest-rate expectations and capital expenditure cycles influence both ETFs, with growth-oriented names showing sensitivity to valuation multiples. Capital flows into technology have remained resilient across recent market cycles, supported by earnings momentum in semiconductor and software subsectors, although geopolitical tensions and supply-chain constraints introduce periodic volatility.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, ARKW has exhibited greater volatility tied to its concentrated thematic bets and active management style, often amplifying moves during innovation-driven rallies or corrections. XLK has delivered more measured performance consistent with broad technology sector beta, benefiting from the scale and stability of mega-cap constituents. Relative positioning shows ARKW tilting toward smaller, higher-growth disruptors, while XLK emphasizes established leaders with stronger balance sheets. Earnings cycles of top holdings and shifts in interest-rate expectations have historically influenced both funds, with ARKW displaying higher sensitivity to sentiment around emerging technologies.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Investors seeking data-driven insights into ETFs like ARKW and XLK may find the platform useful for refining their screening criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to Technology Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLK). Its significantly lower expense ratio, broader diversification across approximately 75 holdings, and passive replication of a well-established sector index provide greater cost efficiency and lower idiosyncratic risk compared with ARKW’s active, concentrated approach. While ARKW offers differentiated thematic exposure, XLK’s combination of low costs, liquidity, and sector momentum alignment supports a more balanced risk-reward profile in the prevailing environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ARKW vs. XLK commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARKW is a Hold and XLK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 122B vs. ARKW (1.84B). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than ARKW: XLK (30.810) vs ARKW (6.992). ARKW was incepted earlier than XLK: ARKW (12 years) vs XLK (28 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than ARKW (0.76). ARKW has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
ARKWXLKARKW / XLK
Gain YTD6.99230.81023%
Net Assets1.84B122B2%
Total Expense Ratio0.760.08950%
Turnover44.005.00880%
Yield1.490.43351%
Fund Existence12 years28 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARKWXLK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
ARKW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FXP21.340.71
+3.45%
ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50
CPSD27.08N/A
N/A
Calamos S&P 500 Str Alt Prt ETF-Dec
RAFE49.78-0.33
-0.66%
PIMCO RAFI ESG US ETF
BBAX64.46-0.67
-1.03%
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Dev APAC ex-JpnETF
FMAT59.12-0.64
-1.07%
Fidelity MSCI Materials ETF

ARKW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARKW has been loosely correlated with OPEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARKW jumps, then OPEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARKW
1D Price
Change %
ARKW100%
-0.53%
OPEN - ARKW
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.54%
SE - ARKW
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.11%
TSM - ARKW
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
XYZ - ARKW
56%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
FIRY - ARKW
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.95%
More