Ad is loading...
ARLLF
Price
$81.21
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
CLDHF
Price
$0.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARLLF vs CLDHF

Header iconARLLF vs CLDHF Comparison
Open Charts ARLLF vs CLDHFBanner chart's image
Argan Neuilly Sur Seine
Price$81.21
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$118
CapitalizationN/A
Retail China Tr
Price$0.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
ARLLF vs CLDHF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARLLF vs. CLDHF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARLLF is a Hold and CLDHF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (ARLLF: $81.21 vs. CLDHF: $0.58)
Brand notoriety: ARLLF and CLDHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARLLF: 100% vs. CLDHF: 100%
Market capitalization -- ARLLF: $2.09B vs. CLDHF: $1.32B
ARLLF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $2.09B. CLDHF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARLLF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLDHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARLLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLDHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CLDHF is a better buy in the long-term than ARLLF.

Price Growth

ARLLF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLDHF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.29%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.01% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARLLF($2.09B) has a higher market cap than CLDHF($1.32B). CLDHF has higher P/E ratio than ARLLF: CLDHF (18.62) vs ARLLF (2.63). ARLLF YTD gains are higher at: 11.208 vs. CLDHF (-0.051). CLDHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 304M vs. ARLLF (-222.97M). CLDHF has more cash in the bank: 253M vs. ARLLF (52M). CLDHF (1.97B) and ARLLF (2.01B) have identical debt. CLDHF has higher revenues than ARLLF: CLDHF (368M) vs ARLLF (221M).
ARLLFCLDHFARLLF / CLDHF
Capitalization2.09B1.32B159%
EBITDA-222.97M304M-73%
Gain YTD11.208-0.051-21,797%
P/E Ratio2.6318.6214%
Revenue221M368M60%
Total Cash52M253M21%
Total Debt2.01B1.97B102%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVIIX19.73-0.07
-0.35%
Praxis Value Index I
ESAGX10.61-0.07
-0.66%
Ashmore Emerging Markets Equity ESG A
TNVAX18.31-0.18
-0.96%
1290 GAMCO Small/Mid Cap Value A
FOSFX63.95-0.81
-1.25%
Fidelity Overseas
PGOFX51.89-0.92
-1.74%
Pioneer Select Mid Cap Growth A

ARLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARLLF has been loosely correlated with AEDFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARLLF jumps, then AEDFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARLLF
1D Price
Change %
ARLLF100%
N/A
AEDFF - ARLLF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DDHRF - ARLLF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRLOF - ARLLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMWCF - ARLLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IGPYF - ARLLF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLDHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLDHF has been closely correlated with IVREF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CLDHF jumps, then IVREF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLDHF
1D Price
Change %
CLDHF100%
N/A
IVREF - CLDHF
80%
Closely correlated
N/A
KPDCF - CLDHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LVPR - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GWWTF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARLLF - CLDHF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More