ARLP
Price
$26.32
Change
-$0.10 (-0.38%)
Updated
May 23 closing price
Capitalization
2.58B
71 days until earnings call
CCOZF
Price
$1.15
Change
+$0.11 (+10.58%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
13.77B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARLP vs CCOZF

Header iconARLP vs CCOZF Comparison
Open Charts ARLP vs CCOZFBanner chart's image
Alliance Resource Partners
Price$26.32
Change-$0.10 (-0.38%)
Volume$255.34K
Capitalization2.58B
China Coal Energy
Price$1.15
Change+$0.11 (+10.58%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization13.77B
ARLP vs CCOZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARLP vs. CCOZF commentary
May 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARLP is a Buy and CCOZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 25, 2025
Stock price -- (ARLP: $26.32 vs. CCOZF: $1.15)
Brand notoriety: ARLP: Notable vs. CCOZF: Not notable
Both companies represent the Coal industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARLP: 59% vs. CCOZF: 39%
Market capitalization -- ARLP: $2.58B vs. CCOZF: $13.77B
ARLP [@Coal] is valued at $2.58B. CCOZF’s [@Coal] market capitalization is $13.77B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Coal] industry ranges from $75.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Coal] industry is $6.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARLP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCCOZF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ARLP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CCOZF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both ARLP and CCOZF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARLP’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARLP’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

ARLP (@Coal) experienced а -1.35% price change this week, while CCOZF (@Coal) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Coal industry was -3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

ARLP is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Coal (-3.13% weekly)

Companies that mine, process and distribute coal and lignite. Coal goes towards around 30% of global energy production, and is heavily relied upon for electricity generation. Alliance Resource Partners, L.P., Peabody Energy Corporation and Arch Coal Inc. are major coal companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCOZF($13.8B) has a higher market cap than ARLP($2.58B). ARLP has higher P/E ratio than CCOZF: ARLP (4.19) vs CCOZF (3.72). ARLP YTD gains are higher at: 5.415 vs. CCOZF (5.023). CCOZF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 36.7B vs. ARLP (949M). CCOZF has more cash in the bank: 95.5B vs. ARLP (59.8M). ARLP has less debt than CCOZF: ARLP (351M) vs CCOZF (83.1B). CCOZF has higher revenues than ARLP: CCOZF (218B) vs ARLP (2.57B).
ARLPCCOZFARLP / CCOZF
Capitalization2.58B13.8B19%
EBITDA949M36.7B3%
Gain YTD5.4155.023108%
P/E Ratio4.193.72112%
Revenue2.57B218B1%
Total Cash59.8M95.5B0%
Total Debt351M83.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARLP vs CCOZF: Fundamental Ratings
ARLP
CCOZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
314
SMR RATING
1..100
5460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5153
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
531
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARLP's Valuation (9) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZF (16) in the null industry. This means that ARLP’s stock grew similarly to CCOZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARLP's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZF (14) in the null industry. This means that ARLP’s stock grew similarly to CCOZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARLP's SMR Rating (54) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZF (60) in the null industry. This means that ARLP’s stock grew similarly to CCOZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARLP's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZF (53) in the null industry. This means that ARLP’s stock grew similarly to CCOZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARLP's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Coal industry is in the same range as CCOZF (31) in the null industry. This means that ARLP’s stock grew similarly to CCOZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARLP
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARLP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EMGNX29.060.14
+0.48%
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity Inst
RLAIX19.930.09
+0.45%
T. Rowe Price Latin America I
BRKCX14.990.06
+0.40%
MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq C
PPVIX10.49-0.04
-0.38%
Principal SmallCap Value II Instl
RAFGX43.68-0.36
-0.82%
American Funds AMCAP R6

ARLP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARLP has been loosely correlated with BTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ARLP jumps, then BTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARLP
1D Price
Change %
ARLP100%
-0.38%
BTU - ARLP
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.73%
HNRG - ARLP
45%
Loosely correlated
-7.33%
HCC - ARLP
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.07%
AMR - ARLP
43%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
SXC - ARLP
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.60%
More

CCOZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCOZF and BTURF have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCOZF and BTURF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCOZF
1D Price
Change %
CCOZF100%
N/A
BTURF - CCOZF
19%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTU - CCOZF
16%
Poorly correlated
+2.73%
ARLP - CCOZF
14%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
ARCH - CCOZF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SXC - CCOZF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.60%
More