ARLUF
Price
$47.56
Change
+$1.06 (+2.28%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
29.39B
BLBRF
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.05 (-29.41%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
633.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARLUF vs BLBRF

Header iconARLUF vs BLBRF Comparison
Open Charts ARLUF vs BLBRFBanner chart's image
Aristocrat Leisure
Price$47.56
Change+$1.06 (+2.28%)
Volume$2.95K
Capitalization29.39B
Bloomberry Resorts
Price$0.12
Change-$0.05 (-29.41%)
Volume$47K
Capitalization633.34M
ARLUF vs BLBRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARLUF vs. BLBRF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARLUF is a Buy and BLBRF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ARLUF: $47.56 vs. BLBRF: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: ARLUF and BLBRF are both not notable
ARLUF represents the Casinos/Gaming, while BLBRF is part of the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARLUF: 303% vs. BLBRF: 68%
Market capitalization -- ARLUF: $29.39B vs. BLBRF: $633.34M
ARLUF [@Casinos/Gaming] is valued at $29.39B. BLBRF’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $633.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $54.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $39.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $5.61B. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARLUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBLBRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARLUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BLBRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARLUF is a better buy in the long-term than BLBRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARLUF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ARLUF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

ARLUF (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а +7.44% price change this week, while BLBRF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.59%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Casinos/Gaming (+1.70% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.93% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARLUF($29.4B) has a higher market cap than BLBRF($633M). BLBRF has higher P/E ratio than ARLUF: BLBRF (90.95) vs ARLUF (41.99). ARLUF YTD gains are higher at: 11.783 vs. BLBRF (-30.706). BLBRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 17.2B vs. ARLUF (2.35B). BLBRF has more cash in the bank: 25.3B vs. ARLUF (959M). ARLUF has less debt than BLBRF: ARLUF (2.41B) vs BLBRF (106B). BLBRF has higher revenues than ARLUF: BLBRF (55.1B) vs ARLUF (6.37B).
ARLUFBLBRFARLUF / BLBRF
Capitalization29.4B633M4,645%
EBITDA2.35B17.2B14%
Gain YTD11.783-30.706-38%
P/E Ratio41.9990.9546%
Revenue6.37B55.1B12%
Total Cash959M25.3B4%
Total Debt2.41B106B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARLUF: Fundamental Ratings
ARLUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
88
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
25
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARLUFBLBRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
5%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
50%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARLUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MDFOX8.01N/A
N/A
BlackRock Large Cap Focus Growth Inv A
PFGKX38.69N/A
N/A
Victory Pioneer Fundamental Growth R6
SREZX13.79N/A
N/A
PGIM Select Real Estate Z
EMSQX20.36N/A
N/A
Shelton Emerging Markets Institutiona
FOSCX30.46-0.05
-0.16%
Tributary Small Company Instl

ARLUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARLUF and GMVHY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARLUF and GMVHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARLUF
1D Price
Change %
ARLUF100%
+2.28%
GMVHY - ARLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
BRSL - ARLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
CZR - ARLUF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
RRR - ARLUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
RSI - ARLUF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.43%
More

BLBRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BLBRF has been loosely correlated with SKYZF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BLBRF jumps, then SKYZF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BLBRF
1D Price
Change %
BLBRF100%
N/A
SKYZF - BLBRF
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AINSF - BLBRF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARLUF - BLBRF
0%
Poorly correlated
+2.28%
AGTEF - BLBRF
0%
Poorly correlated
+61.81%
EHGRF - BLBRF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More