ARMN
Price
$3.56
Change
-$0.23 (-6.07%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
TSGZF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

ARMN vs TSGZF

Header iconARMN vs TSGZF Comparison
Open Charts ARMN vs TSGZFBanner chart's image
Aris Mining
Price$3.56
Change-$0.23 (-6.07%)
Volume$11.87K
CapitalizationN/A
TriStar Gold
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$116K
CapitalizationN/A
ARMN vs TSGZF Comparison Chart
Loading...
ARMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARMN vs. TSGZF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARMN is a Hold and TSGZF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (ARMN: $3.55 vs. TSGZF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: ARMN and TSGZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARMN: 182% vs. TSGZF: 171%
Market capitalization -- ARMN: $500.54M vs. TSGZF: $24.06M
ARMN [@Precious Metals] is valued at $500.54M. TSGZF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $24.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTSGZF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • ARMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TSGZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, ARMN is a better buy in the long-term than TSGZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TSGZF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TSGZF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ARMN is a better buy in the short-term than TSGZF.

Price Growth

ARMN (@Precious Metals) experienced а -14.25% price change this week, while TSGZF (@Precious Metals) price change was -13.51% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARMN($501M) has a higher market cap than TSGZF($24.1M). ARMN has higher P/E ratio than TSGZF: ARMN (45.50) vs TSGZF (34.01). ARMN YTD gains are higher at: 15.373 vs. TSGZF (-0.467). ARMN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 122M vs. TSGZF (-2.18M). ARMN has more cash in the bank: 195M vs. TSGZF (4.03M). ARMN has higher revenues than TSGZF: ARMN (448M) vs TSGZF (0).
ARMNTSGZFARMN / TSGZF
Capitalization501M24.1M2,079%
EBITDA122M-2.18M-5,607%
Gain YTD15.373-0.467-3,295%
P/E Ratio45.5034.01134%
Revenue448M0-
Total Cash195M4.03M4,845%
Total Debt383MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ARMN vs TSGZF: Fundamental Ratings
ARMN
TSGZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1315
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
75
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
8991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3896
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ARMN's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSGZF (75). This means that ARMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (100). This means that ARMN’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARMN's SMR Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (91). This means that ARMN’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARMN's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as TSGZF (65). This means that ARMN’s stock grew similarly to TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

ARMN's P/E Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TSGZF (96). This means that ARMN’s stock grew somewhat faster than TSGZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARMNTSGZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
ARMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TSGZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SVOAX16.48N/A
N/A
SEI US Managed Volatility F (SIMT)
JGINX71.08-0.26
-0.36%
Janus Henderson Growth And Income I
AEYGX34.65-0.13
-0.36%
American Century Equity Growth R5
SAIEX10.06-0.06
-0.59%
Spirit of America Energy Institutional
DTSGX17.67-0.17
-0.95%
Wilshire Small Company Growth Invmt

ARMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARMN has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARMN jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARMN
1D Price
Change %
ARMN100%
+2.16%
AEM - ARMN
68%
Closely correlated
-1.10%
KGC - ARMN
67%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
GOLD - ARMN
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.67%
PAAS - ARMN
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.05%
WPM - ARMN
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.43%
More

TSGZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TSGZF and TIHRF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TSGZF and TIHRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TSGZF
1D Price
Change %
TSGZF100%
N/A
TIHRF - TSGZF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARMN - TSGZF
7%
Poorly correlated
-6.33%
UGDIF - TSGZF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
THMG - TSGZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-26.48%
TNGMF - TSGZF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More