ARRNF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.01 (-3.70%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
140.91M
MMILF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 15 closing price
Capitalization
366.35M
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARRNF vs MMILF

Header iconARRNF vs MMILF Comparison
Open Charts ARRNF vs MMILFBanner chart's image
American Rare Earths
Price$0.26
Change-$0.01 (-3.70%)
Volume$1.24M
Capitalization140.91M
Metro Mining
Price$0.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization366.35M
ARRNF vs MMILF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARRNF vs. MMILF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARRNF is a Hold and MMILF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (ARRNF: $0.26 vs. MMILF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: ARRNF and MMILF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARRNF: 52% vs. MMILF: 6%
Market capitalization -- ARRNF: $140.91M vs. MMILF: $366.35M
ARRNF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $140.91M. MMILF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $366.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARRNF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMMILF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARRNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MMILF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MMILF is a better buy in the long-term than ARRNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARRNF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MMILF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MMILF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MMILF is a better buy in the short-term than ARRNF.

Price Growth

ARRNF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +10.64% price change this week, while MMILF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +270.94%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.03% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMILF($366M) has a higher market cap than ARRNF($141M). MMILF YTD gains are higher at: 83.150 vs. ARRNF (53.392). MMILF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 132M vs. ARRNF (-6.68M).
ARRNFMMILFARRNF / MMILF
Capitalization141M366M39%
EBITDA-6.68M132M-5%
Gain YTD53.39283.15064%
P/E RatioN/A3.32-
RevenueN/A371M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARRNFMMILF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MMILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRERX27.31N/A
N/A
Principal Real Estate Securities R3
THOGX48.01N/A
N/A
Thornburg Global Opportunities R6
RYRAX54.98N/A
N/A
Rydex Retailing H
GMVCX15.88N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Equity C
AQGRX13.33N/A
N/A
AQR Global Equity R6

ARRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARRNF and AABB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARRNF and AABB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARRNF
1D Price
Change %
ARRNF100%
-3.42%
AABB - ARRNF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
AFMJF - ARRNF
23%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
ERMAY - ARRNF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSUGY - ARRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.91%
CRECF - ARRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
+11.26%
More

MMILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MMILF and VDOMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MMILF and VDOMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MMILF
1D Price
Change %
MMILF100%
N/A
VDOMF - MMILF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COPAF - MMILF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DETRF - MMILF
9%
Poorly correlated
-2.77%
METOF - MMILF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ARRNF - MMILF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.42%
More