It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARRPY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBJCHF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARRPY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BJCHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ARRPY (@Air Freight/Couriers) experienced а +8.18% price change this week, while BJCHF (@Air Freight/Couriers) price change was +4.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Air Freight/Couriers industry was -1.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.55%.
The Air Freight/Couriers industry operates air transportation and recurring delivery services. This includes companies offering same-day deliveries, scheduled delivery and logistical services. The proliferation of e-commerce/online retail with a growing emphasis on faster delivery has expanded opportunities for this industry, and induced more competition. United Parcel Service, Inc., FedEx Corporation and Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. are some of the major companies in this industry.
| ARRPY | BJCHF | ARRPY / BJCHF | |
| Capitalization | 13.6B | 1.71B | 793% |
| EBITDA | 1.47B | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 29.563 | -3.857 | -766% |
| P/E Ratio | 138.36 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 6.43B | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | 1.8B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 10B | N/A | - |
ARRPY | BJCHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 46 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 81 Overvalued | 78 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 92 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BJCHF's Valuation (78) in the null industry is in the same range as ARRPY (81). This means that BJCHF’s stock grew similarly to ARRPY’s over the last 12 months.
ARRPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BJCHF (100). This means that ARRPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BJCHF’s over the last 12 months.
BJCHF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as ARRPY (93). This means that BJCHF’s stock grew similarly to ARRPY’s over the last 12 months.
ARRPY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BJCHF (60). This means that ARRPY’s stock grew similarly to BJCHF’s over the last 12 months.
ARRPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BJCHF (2). This means that ARRPY’s stock grew similarly to BJCHF’s over the last 12 months.
| ARRPY | BJCHF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 38% | 2 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 44% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 47% | 2 days ago 47% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 55% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 32% | 2 days ago 66% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ETHA | 23.59 | 0.88 | +3.87% |
| iShares Ethereum Trust ETF | |||
| DJP | 37.28 | 0.24 | +0.65% |
| iPath® Bloomberg Cmdty TR ETN | |||
| JULJ | 25.03 | -0.04 | -0.15% |
| Innovator Premium Income 30 Bar ETF -Jul | |||
| JAVA | 68.67 | -0.18 | -0.26% |
| JPMorgan Active Value ETF | |||
| IZRL | 28.21 | -0.44 | -1.54% |
| ARK Israel Innovative Technology ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that BJCHF and ASLE have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BJCHF and ASLE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BJCHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BJCHF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASLE - BJCHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.98% | ||
| BJCHY - BJCHF | 20% Poorly correlated | -15.70% | ||
| FLGZY - BJCHF | 5% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| ARRPY - BJCHF | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FPRUF - BJCHF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||