Ad is loading...
ARSMX vs SSGSX
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.04
Change-$0.43 (-4.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets319.64M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.36
Change-$3.24 (-7.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.88B
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. ARSMX (320M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: SSGSX (0.52) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSMX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ARSMX (1.29) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSMX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.01 vs. SSGSX (-9.24). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 89.34 vs. SSGSX (51.13).
| ARSMX | SSGSX | ARSMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.601 | -6.095 | 43% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 320M | 5.88B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.52 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.01 | -9.24 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.12 | -10.59 | -1% |
| Returns for 5 years | 89.34 | 51.13 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.97 | 10.74 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers