Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs SSGSX
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.95
Change+$0.08 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets350.57M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.47
Change+$0.28 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.82B
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.82B vs. ARSMX (351M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: SSGSX (0.51) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSMX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ARSMX (1.29) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSMX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. SSGSX (-1.26). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 53.59 vs. SSGSX (29.33).
| ARSMX | SSGSX | ARSMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.538 | -2.068 | -171% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 351M | 5.82B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.51 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.97 | -1.26 | -473% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.63 | 2.38 | 699% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.59 | 29.33 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.20 | 16.52 | 165% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers