Ad is loading...
ARSMX vs SSGSX
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs SSGSX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.05
Change+$0.12 (+1.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets303.07M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
ARSMX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. ARSMX (303M). SSGSX pays higher dividends than ARSMX: SSGSX (0.52) vs ARSMX (0.23). ARSMX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: ARSMX (18 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). ARSMX (1.29) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: ARSMX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). ARSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.74 vs. SSGSX (-14.61). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 59.15 vs. SSGSX (23.96).
| ARSMX | SSGSX | ARSMX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.26 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.076 | -13.720 | 52% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 303M | 5.33B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.23 | 0.52 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.74 | -14.61 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.86 | -16.35 | 24% |
| Returns for 5 years | 59.15 | 23.96 | 247% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.02 | 2.97 | 472% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers