Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ARSMX vs WCMFX
ARSMX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts ARSMX vs WCMFX
AMG River Road Small-Mid Cap Value N
Price$9.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets342.53M
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.37
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.92M
ARSMX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ARSMX vs. WCMFX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSMX is a Hold and WCMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ARSMX has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. WCMFX (5.92M). ARSMX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: ARSMX (0.22) vs WCMFX (0.00). ARSMX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: ARSMX (19 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than ARSMX (1.29). ARSMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.00 vs. WCMFX (15.00). ARSMX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMFX: ARSMX (2000) vs WCMFX (100000). ARSMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -10.91 vs. WCMFX (-76.30). ARSMX return over 5 years is better than : 22.43 vs. WCMFX (-65.40).
| ARSMX | WCMFX | ARSMX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 0.90 | 143% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.29 | 1.45 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.832 | -71.870 | 1% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 100000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 343M | 5.92M | 5,795% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.22 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.91 | -76.30 | 14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.31 | -67.31 | -8% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.43 | -65.40 | -34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 27.84 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement