ARSSF
Price
$0.63
Change
-$0.04 (-5.97%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
2.12B
BOWFF
Price
$50.29
Change
-$0.26 (-0.51%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

ARSSF vs BOWFF

Header iconARSSF vs BOWFF Comparison
Open Charts ARSSF vs BOWFFBanner chart's image
Assura
Price$0.63
Change-$0.04 (-5.97%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization2.12B
Boardwalk Real Estate Investment Trust
Price$50.29
Change-$0.26 (-0.51%)
Volume$4.23K
Capitalization2.69B
ARSSF vs BOWFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BOWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ARSSF vs. BOWFF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARSSF is a Hold and BOWFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (ARSSF: $0.63 vs. BOWFF: $50.29)
Brand notoriety: ARSSF and BOWFF are both not notable
ARSSF represents the Managed Health Care, while BOWFF is part of the Media Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ARSSF: 21% vs. BOWFF: 31%
Market capitalization -- ARSSF: $2.12B vs. BOWFF: $2.69B
ARSSF [@Managed Health Care] is valued at $2.12B. BOWFF’s [@Media Conglomerates] market capitalization is $2.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Managed Health Care] industry ranges from $116.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Media Conglomerates] industry ranges from $27.71B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Managed Health Care] industry is $8.65B. The average market capitalization across the [@Media Conglomerates] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ARSSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBOWFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ARSSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BOWFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BOWFF is a better buy in the long-term than ARSSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ARSSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BOWFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ARSSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BOWFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BOWFF is a better buy in the short-term than ARSSF.

Price Growth

ARSSF (@Managed Health Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BOWFF (@Media Conglomerates) price change was +0.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Managed Health Care industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.20%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Media Conglomerates industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.43%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Managed Health Care (+0.01% weekly)

Managed healthcare industry focuses on providing health/medical and disability insurance plans, generally intended to reduce the cost of for-profit health care. The insurance products might be provided through employer-paid (fully or partly) insurance and benefit programs, or through Medicare/Medicaid. Some of the largest providers of managed health care include Aetna, Humana Inc., and Cigna, and UnitedHealthcare.

@Media Conglomerates (+2.48% weekly)

Companies that operate in these three (or more) areas: broadcasting, cable TV, publishing and movies/entertainment. The companies usually have a large share in these markets. Walt Disney Co . is an example.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BOWFF($2.69B) has a higher market cap than ARSSF($2.12B). BOWFF has higher P/E ratio than ARSSF: BOWFF (11.46) vs ARSSF (8.86). ARSSF YTD gains are higher at: 28.921 vs. BOWFF (12.796). BOWFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 449M vs. ARSSF (97.1M). ARSSF has more cash in the bank: 28.2M vs. BOWFF (25.6M). ARSSF has less debt than BOWFF: ARSSF (1.6B) vs BOWFF (3.29B). BOWFF has higher revenues than ARSSF: BOWFF (622M) vs ARSSF (164M).
ARSSFBOWFFARSSF / BOWFF
Capitalization2.12B2.69B79%
EBITDA97.1M449M22%
Gain YTD28.92112.796226%
P/E Ratio8.8611.4677%
Revenue164M622M26%
Total Cash28.2M25.6M110%
Total Debt1.6B3.29B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BOWFF: Fundamental Ratings
BOWFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
90
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
42
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
59
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ARSSFBOWFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ARSSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BOWFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MINGX43.51N/A
N/A
MFS International Intrinsic Value R3
FIRIX10.64N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Intl Real Estate I
HIADX21.78N/A
N/A
Hartford Dividend and Growth HLS IA
WBSIX35.82N/A
N/A
William Blair Small Cap Growth I
LSPIX5.49N/A
N/A
LoCorr Spectrum Income I

ARSSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ARSSF and MAPGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ARSSF and MAPGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ARSSF
1D Price
Change %
ARSSF100%
N/A
MAPGF - ARSSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSRTF - ARSSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.39%
ATRRF - ARSSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOWFF - ARSSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A